FoxesTalk - Leicester City F.C. Forum: Fryatt's Late Brace Takes Him Up To First Place - FoxesTalk - Leicester City F.C. Forum

Jump to content


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Fryatt's Late Brace Takes Him Up To First Place Bristol Rovers Ratings Results Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   sheffield_fox 

  • Gary Lineker
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,399
  • Joined: 11-July 04
  • Location:Coalville

Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:57 PM

Leicester City 2-1 Bristol Rovers
1 November 2008

Matty Fryatt sealed back-to-back man of the match awards with his second double of the week against Paul Trollope's Bristol Rovers side at the Walkers Stadium on Saturday. Fryatt's mark would no doubt have been different if it weren't for the two late goals but to bring out a clichι, goals win games and that is exactly what Fryatt did for the Foxes on Saturday. Ever impressive Bulgarian Aleksandar Tunchev was runner-up to Fryatt with impact sub Nicky Adams finishing in third place.

Max Gradel continued his bad run of form with the ratings, following up his flop of the month for October with flop of the match against the Gasheads. Out of position defender Jack Hobbs failed to impress again finishing just above Gradel in the rankings, with second half sub Bruno Berner rounding off the top three.

Full results below:

Player Awards:

Man of the Match: Matty Fryatt – 7.54

Flop of the Match: Max Gradel – 4.49

Best Defender: Aleksandar Tunchev – 6.81
Best Midfielder: Nicky Adams – 6.78
Best Striker: Matty Fryatt – 7.54

Full Ratings:

1. Matty Fryatt – 7.54
2. Aleksandar Tunchev – 6.81
3. Nicky Adams – 6.78
4. Joe Mattock – 6.58
5. Paul Henderson – 6.52
6. Barry Hayles – 6.49
7. Patrick Kisnorbo – 6.30
8. Lloyd Dyer – 6.20
9. Andy King – 5.98
10. Matt Oakley – 5.92
11. Steve Howard – 5.79
12. Bruno Berner – 5.71
13. Jack Hobbs – 4.83
14. Max Gradel – 4.49

Voter Awards:

Top Voters: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar / Corky / Isopen / Oxfoxile / Fox You Forest

Most Generous Voter: 1st – Melton Fox – 7.50 / 2nd – JakeShingler / Baker11 – 7.29 / 3rd – Ross-kemp / Liam – 7.21

Harshest Voter: 1st – homer – 5.00 / 2nd – Andrew corley – 5.07 / 3rd – pds – 5.14

Plenty of votes for this game, much appreciated so please keep voting. Voting for the next game opens at Rotherham tomorrow night so log on to www.player-ratings.com/rate to vote after the match.
0

#2 User is offline   Ross-Kemp 

  • Gary Lineker
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 967
  • Joined: 20-August 08
  • Location:Afghanistan
  • Supported City Since:wearing casual clothing made me an hooligan

Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:06 PM

Cheers sheff-fox :thumbup:
0

#3 User is online   JoeyB 

  • Whoope de **** do
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,912
  • Joined: 27-August 06
  • Location:Leicester
  • Supported City Since:When i was born

Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:32 PM

Brilliant!

You are a Ledge Sheff Fox.

Am surprised about Steve Howards rating very surprised, some people are WAY to harsh on him
0

#4 User is offline   Corky 

  • At least it wasn't Dowie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12,548
  • Joined: 22-September 07
  • Supported City Since:1919

Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:38 PM

I know he scored two goals, but I'm surprised Fryatt got MOM.
0

#5 User is offline   Joe. 

  • The good ship Albion
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 18,291
  • Joined: 23-September 06
  • Location:Groby
  • Supported City Since:1999 Roughly.

Posted 03 November 2008 - 10:22 PM

Very harsh on Oakley I think.

I don't vote in this anymore, purely for some of the reasons above. How can anybody rate our collective team performance at an average of 5?! And the same applies for the high ones too.
0

#6 User is offline   sheffield_fox 

  • Gary Lineker
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,399
  • Joined: 11-July 04
  • Location:Coalville

Posted 03 November 2008 - 10:42 PM

View PostJoe., on Nov 3 2008, 10:22 PM, said:

Very harsh on Oakley I think.

I don't vote in this anymore, purely for some of the reasons above. How can anybody rate our collective team performance at an average of 5?! And the same applies for the high ones too.


The idea of this is to get a collective range of opinions to form an overall view which causes debate amongst people who went and hopefully gives a more accurate impression for the people who didn't. By not giving your vote, surely you are allowing the 'extremists' if you will to have more of an influence?
0

#7 User is offline   Corky 

  • At least it wasn't Dowie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12,548
  • Joined: 22-September 07
  • Supported City Since:1919

Posted 03 November 2008 - 10:43 PM

You do a fantastic job sheff_fox, keep it up :thumbup:
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users