Help
Millwall 0-1 Leicester City
14 March 2009
Jack Hobbs claimed his second man of the match award in as many games with an authoritative performance at centre back at Millwall on Saturday. It was a generally impressive display from City with Hobbs' main competition coming in the form of midfield duo Matt Oakley and Tom Cleverley. Steve Howard was unlucky not to make the top three after an impressive display capped by the winning goal.
Lloyd Dyer's return to the starting eleven showed no improvement on the performances before his rest after comfortably being voted Leicester's worst performer at the New Den. Tranmere flop Joe Mattock just missed out on the award again with centre back Michael Morrison also struggling again after finding himself in the bottom three.
Full results below:
Player Awards:
Man of the Match: Jack Hobbs – 7.94
Flop of the Match: Lloyd Dyer – 5.53
Best Goalkeeper / Defender: Jack Hobbs – 7.94
Best Midfielder: Matt Oakley – 7.62
Best Striker: Steve Howard – 7.51
Full Ratings:
1. Jack Hobbs – 7.94
2. Matt Oakley – 7.62
3. Tom Cleverley – 7.53
4. Steve Howard – 7.51
5. Barry Hayles – 7.02
6. Andy King – 6.79
7. Tony Warner / Matty Fryatt – 6.75
9. Kerrea Gilbert – 6.70
10. Michael Morrison – 6.53
11. Joe Mattock – 6.21
12. Lloyd Dyer – 5.53
Voter Awards:
Top/Fairest Voters:
Adam Sharma / James / Halfsy
Most Generous Voter:
1st – Melton Fox – 8.75
2nd – peterborofox – 7.67
3rd – JakeShingler / steve arscott – 7.42
Harshest Voter:
1st – Tango Fox – 5.42
2nd – Fleckneymike – 6.00
3rd – marshall cockney fox / beaumontfox – 6.17
(Anonymous voters are not included in the voter awards)
Total Votes: 53 - thanks to everyone who rated. Not many games left now so keep up the voting!
Page 1 of 1
Second MotM In A Week For Hobbs
Millwall Ratings Results
Rate Topic:
#1
- Gary Lineker
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,399
- Joined: 11-July 04
- Location:Coalville
Posted 16 March 2009 - 08:58 PM
Back to top
#2
- The good ship Albion
- Group: Members
- Posts: 18,291
- Joined: 23-September 06
- Location:Groby
- Supported City Since:1999 Roughly.
Posted 16 March 2009 - 09:03 PM
Very much deserved, he was brilliant.
#3
- Bruno!
- Group: Members
- Posts: 31,542
- Joined: 26-August 06
- Location:Stanton Under Bardon
- Supported City Since:I was born.
Posted 16 March 2009 - 09:10 PM
Definitely deserved, absolute rock.
#4
- Gary Lineker
- Group: Members
- Posts: 338
- Joined: 15-January 06
- Location:West Sussex
Posted 16 March 2009 - 09:12 PM
He deserved it - even their fans (grudgingly) said he played really well
#5
- Gary Lineker
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,743
- Joined: 30-July 05
- Supported City Since:Since I was born. So 1993.
Posted 16 March 2009 - 09:20 PM
Deserved, was a rock.
Also harshest voter, 5.42, what game was he/she at?
Also harshest voter, 5.42, what game was he/she at?
#6
- 'A Word In Your Shell-Like, Pal.'
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,831
- Joined: 02-October 07
- Location:Peterborough
- Supported City Since:Birth
Posted 16 March 2009 - 09:49 PM
i dont think dyer was that bad
he actually did a hell of a lot of defensive work on saturday
he actually did a hell of a lot of defensive work on saturday
#7
- Just my opinion
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,217
- Joined: 27-July 08
- Location:Narborough
- Supported City Since:May 10th 1993
Posted 16 March 2009 - 09:51 PM
hobbs did do well but how in gods name did he get it for tranmere, he was absolutely diabolical for that game
#8
- Morro
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,965
- Joined: 12-September 06
- Location:Laaaaandan! Soon to be Manc though
- Supported City Since:Brian Little
Posted 16 March 2009 - 10:10 PM
Was a bit surprised that Oakley didn't get it to be honest but can't begrudge Hobbs as he was also immense on saturday
#9
- Gary Lineker
- Group: Members
- Posts: 410
- Joined: 01-September 05
Posted 17 March 2009 - 11:04 AM
super city, on Mar 16 2009, 09:51 PM, said:
hobbs did do well but how in gods name did he get it for tranmere, he was absolutely diabolical for that game
So was everyone else! It was an award nobody deserved to win.
Simon
#10
- Useful from set-pieces.
- Group: Writer
- Posts: 10,049
- Joined: 11-July 04
- Location:Mountsorrel
Posted 17 March 2009 - 03:14 PM
I didn't vote but the order looks spot on.
I'm glad people can look beyond Mattock's supposed 'potential'.
I'm glad people can look beyond Mattock's supposed 'potential'.
#11
- Leicester,Leicester,Leicester.
- Group: Members
- Posts: 6,428
- Joined: 21-November 07
- Location:N/L
- Supported City Since:I was a wee nipper
Posted 17 March 2009 - 03:19 PM
Cheers SF 
Genourous voter 3rd
Genourous voter 3rd
#12
- Gary Lineker
- Group: Members
- Posts: 474
- Joined: 05-March 08
- Location:Enderby, Leicestershire
- Supported City Since:2007: Relegation, but still I became utterly addicted and have never looked back...
Posted 17 March 2009 - 04:03 PM
Yay! I'm the top/fairest voter!
Still can't quite work out what that means but it's the first time I've got it...
Still can't quite work out what that means but it's the first time I've got it...
#13
- Gary Lineker
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,399
- Joined: 11-July 04
- Location:Coalville
Posted 17 March 2009 - 05:29 PM
lcfcadam, on Mar 17 2009, 04:03 PM, said:
Yay! I'm the top/fairest voter!
Still can't quite work out what that means but it's the first time I've got it...
Still can't quite work out what that means but it's the first time I've got it...
It means you weren't generous and you weren't harsh (you were closest to the overall voter average).
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1