Parafox Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 Playboy is to stop publishing pictures of naked women, saying easy access to such images online means they are "passe". The magazine famed for its bunny girls, who have included Baywatch star Pamela Anderson and supermodel Kate Moss, aims to become more accessible as it enters its 63rd year, its chief content officer said. Cory Jones, who was appointed in July, told the New York Times the move away from total nudity is the right one. "You're now one click away from every sex act imaginable for free. And so it's just passe at this juncture," he said. He added: "Don't get me wrong. Twelve-year-old me is very disappointed in current me. But it's the right thing to do." The magazine's founder, 89-year-old Hugh Hefner, recognisable for his trademark red smoking jacket, agreed to the change proposed by Mr Jones last month, the paper said. When he created it in 1953, Hefner wrote that the magazine and its content would appeal to men aged 18 to 80. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnegan Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 Surprised it took them this long actually. I've not understood the point of porn mags for a long time. Everyone's got a phone and or a laptop. Got to reinvent themselves if they want to stay profitable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry - LCFC Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 It's like the demise of the Hot Celebs thread all over again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnegan Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 The hot celebs thread is one of the reasons Playboy is redundant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScouseFox Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 as a legit point they should just post pics of genuine celebs who are hot not randomers with big titties. you can get randomers by just googling the word tits, hot celebs are much cooler. which is why hot celebs was a better thread than chebs (marginally). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitchandro Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 as a legit point they should just post pics of genuine celebs who are hot not randomers with big titties. you can get randomers by just googling the word tits, hot celebs are much cooler. which is why hot celebs was a better thread than chebs (marginally). I've never really been bothered if they're celebs or not. Tits are tits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScouseFox Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 I've never really been bothered if they're celebs or not. Tits are tits. yeah but theres no niche in that is there. anyone can do pic of tits. gotta be more thoughtful and itk to get new pics of sexy celebs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 I think the last time I bought it I was about 14, but without the tits won't it just be 60 pages of wristwatch adverts and aftershave samples? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 Surprised it took them this long actually. I've not understood the point of porn mags for a long time. Everyone's got a phone and or a laptop. Got to reinvent themselves if they want to stay profitable. Not sure the magazine side has been very profitable for a long time anyway. Probably make most of their money licensing the bunny logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sphericalfox Posted 13 October 2015 Share Posted 13 October 2015 Not sure the magazine side has been very profitable for a long time anyway. Probably make most of their money licensing the bunny logo. On children's clothes, pencil and lunchboxes. It's hard times for Hugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izzy Posted 14 October 2015 Share Posted 14 October 2015 I think the last time I bought it I was about 14, but without the tits won't it just be 60 pages of wristwatch adverts and aftershave samples? The youth of today don't know how lucky they are getting free porn on their phones and tablets. No embarrassment of buying a magazine from the local newsagent then your Mum finding them under your bed with the pages stuck together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Oxlong Posted 14 October 2015 Share Posted 14 October 2015 Lad at my school used to write his name on the inside of his mags. He used to end up before the Head when anyone got caught with one of his journals. Then as an adult he got imprisoned after trying to sell drugs to a plain clothes police officer. Some people are literally born losers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.