Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Drygon

Should Ranieri stick with 4-4-2 system do you think?

Recommended Posts

NO. Even knowing Leicester counter attack's based game, Guardiola showed an incredible arrogance by high line defending and only 3 defenders. He didn't respect Leicester and took the victory for granted no matter what. He played right in our hands. Without taking his merit away, there is no tactical genius from Ranieri here, same formation, same players since forever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a system that won us the title. However, we should play the system that best fits our players or works well against out opponents. Fantastic result tonight, a key being that we got in front early. Compare this to the West Brom game when we were behind. Some teams will deliberately counter our system so sometimes we need to change. 

 

If Ndidi arrives in Jan it may help a lot with 4-4-2 which would be great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ranieri gets paid millions to know what needs to be done, it proved right today because the players all gave it 100%, that is the most important thing in any system. Our defending and finishing was miles ahead of what it had been today, when it clicks we play some of the best football

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

Not sure. It seems to be the only thing Ranieri knows and, as we've seen, it doesn't always work. 

Tonight, the Mancs were there for the taking and the formation worked. But it won't always.

Exactly, we should be playing formation and tactics to suit the opposition, 4-4-2 is ok for certain games, but not others, as we have found out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to adaptable. As someone said above Man City's tactics couldn't have been more suited to us

 

Still think a 451/433 away from home will be needed in away games, which is now an option with James, Mendy and Drinkwater coming back in we finally have options

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Monsell1976 said:

Exactly, we should be playing formation and tactics to suit the opposition, 4-4-2 is ok for certain games, but not others, as we have found out.

I just can't see 4-4-2 working away from home at places like Bournemouth and Stoke who we have next. Matt Elliott said on the radio he'd drop Amartey and bring Drinkwater back in for the next match, that's simply the wrong choice. King and Drinkwater has never worked properly and you need someone doing the defensive work in a 4-4-2 which Amartey at least tries to do, but away from home looks much less convincing at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lcfcsnow said:

I just can't see 4-4-2 working away from home at places like Bournemouth and Stoke who we have next. Matt Elliott said on the radio he'd drop Amartey and bring Drinkwater back in for the next match, that's simply the wrong choice. King and Drinkwater has never worked properly and you need someone doing the defensive work in a 4-4-2 which Amartey at least tries to do, but away from home looks much less convincing at it.

Agree, amartey carried that midfield today, played that well, he shouldn't be dropped, and if he can play like that with drinkwater, it will free Danny up to push forward and link up with the forwards more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...