DB11 Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 And denied bail! West Ham footballer Ravel Morrison remanded in custody over assault1 hour agoRavel Morrison was sold to West Ham for £650,000 in January 2012West Ham footballer Ravel Morrison has been remanded in custody accused of punching and slapping his ex-girlfriend and her mother.Mr Morrison, 21, of Urmston, appeared at Manchester and Salford Magistrates' Court charged with two counts of common assault. He was refused bail.He is alleged to have assaulted Reah Mansoor, 19, and Parveen Mansoor, 39, in the early hours of Sunday morning.He is due to appear at the same court on 7 August.England capsA spokeswoman for Greater Manchester Police said: "At about 3.20am on Sunday police were called to an address on Alexandra Road, Peel Green, Salford, following reports a 19-year-old woman and a 39-year-old woman had been assaulted."Officers attended and established the young woman had also been assaulted outside a bar in Manchester city centre earlier that evening and a 21-year-old man was subsequently arrested at a later date."The midfielder was widely tipped to become a Manchester United regular as one of the club's best home-grown prospects in their youth teams.He was sold by former boss Sir Alex Ferguson to West Ham for £650,000 in January 2012.He has since been loaned by West Ham to QPR and Birmingham City.The 21-year-old has won four England Under-21 caps.West Ham have declined to comment. Source: http://bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-28581181 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyT Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 If true, what a **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 He'll get off, come out to a heroes welcome at whatever club will have him and think nothing of it. Oh to be a modern footballer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKCJ Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Annoying that these ***** are given fame and fortune because they can kick a ball about but you just know that she'll have been a right slapper and all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.Lisemore Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Wouldn't surprise me if it were true, held in such high regard by everyone at Man Utd and still managed to **** it all up. Clearly has a screw loose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugo Sanchez Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Didn't he have manky teeth too ? Honestly hope he ends up in prison. Seems a right jumped up little cnut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain... Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Why would bail be refused? He is too high profile to disappear, was it that violent an attack that he is considered a menace to society? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Common assault and he's kept in custody. Absolute pisstake that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugo Sanchez Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 He hit two women !!! Proper pisstake that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 His girlfriends mum, there are arse holes and then there are people who hit their girlfriends mum, he must of been on something, if he wasn't then, well, let him have a word with Nile Ranger about how far natural talent will get you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 He hit two women !!! Proper pisstake that. You do realise common assault is the lowest on the scale of harmful crime. Nothing has been proven yet so you can't say what he has or hasn't done. He's only been kept in custody because he's a footballer. He's not even gonna face prison if he's found guilty, that's how low the charge is in the whole scale of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 You do realise common assault is the lowest on the scale of harmful crime. Nothing has been proven yet so you can't say what he has or hasn't done. He's only been kept in custody because he's a footballer. He's not even gonna face prison if he's found guilty, that's how low the charge is in the whole scale of things. Yes, because no-one has ever been remanded into custody for an offence of common assault before... He can face up to six months imprisonment. Do you know the full circumstances? Many reasons why bail can be refused anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Yes, because no-one has ever been remanded into custody for an offence of common assault before... He can face up to six months imprisonment. Do you know the full circumstances? Many reasons why bail can be refused anyway. Yeah 6 months max which considering he's never been found guilty of a similar crime is highly unlikely. The amount of aggro that happens on a weekly basis in city centres up and down the country and you think people are regularly held in custody for a week for common assault? If it was any normal person he would have been charged and released with a date to show up in court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Yeah 6 months max which considering he's never been found guilty of a similar crime is highly unlikely. The amount of aggro that happens on a weekly basis in city centres up and down the country and you think people are regularly held in custody for a week for common assault? If it was any normal person he would have been charged and released with a date to show up in court. I've seen people remanded into custody for common assault, yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxondale Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Well, he's a twat anyway. Purely on the basis that he has his first name on the back of his shirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DennisNedry Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Always had that scummy look about him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 I've seen people remanded into custody for common assault, yeah. The only realistic reason he's been kept on remand is so that he can't get his ex girlfriend to drop the charges. Police want a conviction here clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Always had that scummy look about him. "There's no art to find the mind's construction in the face" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugo Sanchez Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Yes everyweek in the city centre you see a young lad punching and slapping two women (unless Joe Mattock is around) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Yes everyweek in the city centre you see a young lad punching and slapping two women (unless Joe Mattock is around) Mattock was done for affray (worse than common assault) he wasn't remanded in custody and didn't face a custodial sentence when found guilty. Police are clearly out to get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Walsh5 Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 The only realistic reason he's been kept on remand is so that he can't get his ex girlfriend to drop the charges. Police want a conviction here clearly. Or they might have took into consideration his previous for witness intimidation, assaulting his own mother and two previous cases for assaulting the same girl he has attacked this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 Or they might have took into consideration his previous for witness intimidation, assaulting his own mother and two previous cases for assaulting the same girl he has attacked this time. He's been found guilty of witness intimidation. He's been charged 3 times previously and they've all been dropped. He's clearly got issues but compared to other footballers with convictions it's not the worst rap sheet. He's not on the level of the likes of Ched Evans, Marlon King, Titus Bramble, Gary Medine etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugo Sanchez Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 He hits women, he's a cnut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 31 July 2014 Share Posted 31 July 2014 He hits women, he's a cnut. That's such a sweeping statement though why are women any different from men? So your saying if a woman became violent towards you and started throwing punches and tried to fight you that you would let her? If a bloke did the same you would be raging but because it's a woman she's allowed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.