Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
boots60

Keith Vaz

Recommended Posts

http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/04/keith-vaz-steps-down-after-sex-with-male-prostitutes-is-revealed-in-sting-6108226/?ito=facebook

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/04/keith-vaz-to-step-down-commons-committee-chair-sunday-mirror-sex-claims

 

 

Stepped down or is going to step down anyway. Might have got away with it if he were in a different position of the government but as Xen mentioned, if your on a committee about prostitution and drugs then it's pretty rich to be doing both yourself isnt it, given his parties stance on the two issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, foxoffderby said:

People seem to be getting side tracked by the real issue here, it looks like he was set up by a newspaper who paid men to set up Vaz. Brings back memories of the News of the World and phone tapping Mille Dowler death etc. What people do in their own time is down to them we all have skeletons in the cupboard. How far does a newspaper go to get a story? The real issue here is a ethics question. If the police had set somebody up the case would be thrown out of court. What real crime has Vaz done here apart from letting his family down?

Like many others in the public eye, what Members of Parliament do, even in their own time, is likely to be the subject of public scrutiny because those trusted with responsibility are expected to set the standards that go with their position.

 

Top footballers are encouraged to be role models, teachers/doctors etc are not expected to seduce their students (it's a breach of trust even if they're of legal age) and MPs, charged with serving the nation, are expected to be above reproach in all things and most especially anything that might rebound badly on themselves, their party, their colleagues or the Parliamentary institution.  

 

The fact that there are so few saints out there might well reflect the level of politicians we have today. But, saint or not, there's never much to hold onto for those left exposed, so to speak.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Footballwipe said:

...And will still win Leicester East by about 17,500 votes in 2020

I think those people that vote him really look at themselves.

 

I doubt his popularity will lesson, he is a Indian Agent on the Indian gov payroll advocating Indian gov interests, aslong as that keeps on going the Indians will keep voting for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Footballwipe said:

...And will still win Leicester East by about 17,500 votes in 2020

I think those people that vote him really look at themselves.

 

I doubt his popularity will lesson, he is a Indian Agent on the Indian gov payroll advocating Indian gov interests, aslong as that keeps on going the Indians will keep voting for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, foxoffderby said:

People seem to be getting side tracked by the real issue here, it looks like he was set up by a newspaper who paid men to set up Vaz. Brings back memories of the News of the World and phone tapping Mille Dowler death etc. What people do in their own time is down to them we all have skeletons in the cupboard. How far does a newspaper go to get a story? The real issue here is a ethics question. If the police had set somebody up the case would be thrown out of court. What real crime has Vaz done here apart from letting his family down?

How on earth can you compare hacking the phone of a dead girl, with a paper setting up a sting to catch a public servant doing very questionable things... Especially and most importantly with him being on a committee for drugs and pristitution. It takes the whole thing into the area of public interest.

 

It's not like the paper made him do it, they've most probably been contacted by the escorts who recognised him at previous meetings.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Xen said:

 

Legal.

 

He hasn't committed any crime, but a man/woman in his position is open to a high level of scrutiny in all aspects of his life, and compromising/hypocritical behaviour like what he has engaged in is not tolerable.

 

FFS, he's a married family man who serves on a committee regarding drugs/prostitution, and he's just been caught cheating on his wife with a pair of gay hookers and encouraging the use of (legal high) drugs.

 

His position is untenable, but somehow he'll worm his way into staying in office and he'll still manage to get elected next time around...

Well I stand corrected always thought it was illegal. My apologies 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sharpe's Fox said:

Don't know why he didn't just hire a good looking girl for an hour. Getting some rent boys in has scandalised it too much if it were a bird we'd all be saying guwon Keith give her a good rollicking for the constituents of Leicester East.

He likes cock in his rim??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Sharpe's Fox said:

Jesus mate industrial language like that is too much tone it down a bit, you wouldn't talk like that in public.

 

23 hours ago, Sharpe's Fox said:

Jesus mate industrial language like that is too much tone it down a bit, you wouldn't talk like that in public.

I'm not Jesus, and that's the way I talk, and if you don't like it, put me on ignore!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...