ScouseFox

absolutely remarkable. they just don't get it, do they? they simply think they are better than everyone else.

24 minutes ago, Unabomber said:

It is so weird 

it makes no sense, these are people who have stuck to lockdown rules given to them by these worms, who've now said that for 10 weeks we haven't really had these rules at all. yet they're tripping over themselves to defend him for literally no reason other than they voted for their political party.

i cba anymore. this country is on it's fu cking arse. what's the point. 

23 minutes ago, Mike Oxlong said:

Is sticking a kid in a small metal box for 6 hours with one, if not too symptomatic adults consistent with best scientific advice ? 

no, we’ve just been told to ignore scientific advice and government advice and act on instinct if necessary. which i reckon is how i’ll roll from now on. 

ah looks like he’s had enough. that went well haha. 

the actual prime minister here muting people on zoom calls cos he hasn’t got any more lies left to tell them. how on earth can anyone take this seriously. 

tbh i was at least expecting much bigger relaxations on lockdown as a way to make the cummings story disappear. not even a sliver lining. shame. 

is he going to give us more instructions about lockdown after literally saying he didn’t care that his right hand man broke the last set of rules? is he a retard? 

boris has finally decided to turn up to work today, buzzing 

yes, quite comfortably 

the last two pages of this thread have absolutely done me. fair play. amazing stuff, not sure how on earth you’re meant to discuss that. i’m out. 

8 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

I was going to reply to @MattP's post but it seems anything regarding Corbyn is being deleted.

 

We can criticise Cummings, we know what he did. It's not political, it's out there. Speculating what would be the reaction if it was Corbyn is politicising it. Message at the top is pretty clear.

oh man don’t tell me i waited 24 hours for matt p to blame corbyn for cummings wanting to see some bluebells at the other end of the country and his post got deleted before i could laugh at it, 😔

2 minutes ago, Bilo said:

 

Now a third according to this tweet from two weeks ago.

there’s quite a few tweets of him being in durham that weekend (VE weekend i think?) but i’m not sure we should be crucifying anyone based on some tweets from random accounts, firstly because anyone can lie on twitter and secondly because we’ve all seen what bot accounts can do. 

it did seem weird to me that nobody has picked up the fact he seems to have spent a decent amount of this lockdown wandering round saying hi to strangers in parks before these stories broke. 

6 minutes ago, davieG said:

Nothing wrong with that but people should express their views and then move on all the rest is pointless and ruins the thread for those interested in what else is happening regarding this killer virus.

 

I keep popping in to but all I've seen for the last day or two is this endless argument.

if there was a better, more interesting story to talk about in this thread then that would be what’s dominating the last few pages, surely? isn’t that the whole point of a forum, whatever people are talking about most is gonna be at the top of the board? 

the sad part is that as a story this will die a death as soon as a new coronavirus related story comes out, and as a disgusting individual cummings will get away with it scott free. 

and we’ll just hang around waiting for the next politician to do something nobody else would even dare to do and all his mates will say that’s actually fine. and so on. 

Just now, Voll Blau said:

Nobody on either side should be seeking to politicise this.

 

It's not about Right v Left or Blue v Red. It's about the competence of government during this crisis. Simple as.

if only. 

as always it becomes a political debate as soon as people on either side try to defend the indefensible purely because the guy at fault is on the same side of the game as they are. 

it’s the same as idiot football fans who when their club or their players do something outrageously wrong try and defend it because “he’s one of our own”. saw s a few tweets yday saying this is going to look very similar to kenny dalglish getting the whole liverpool squad to wear t shirts supporting suarez being a racist by the time it’s over and we look back at it and go blimey, why were all those people trying to defend that cu nt. 

11 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

I'm sure they'll still be plenty of room for player statues. It's not instead of. 

but the argument presented that you disagreed with was about the position of the statue. unless they're gonna put a statue of vardy stood on top of the statue of vichai, then he is going to be taking the place of a player. 

Just now, Leicester_Loyal said:

i mean i know you will believe anything they say, but i think it *might* be a bit late for the government to claim that the whole story of him going to durham was a lie

this fella on the news saying he can’t believe anyone even cares because “it’s not laws we’re talking about here, just advice”

jesus fu cking christ 

12 minutes ago, Innovindil said:

Tbf, I was just hoping that some people that are going OTT DEATH TO ALL TORIES over it would maybe get a sense that sometimes people can make mistakes for a reason that at a minimum, they believe to be the right call.

 

Won't hold my breath though and give some people the satisfaction of watching me croak it. 

nobody apart from you seems to care if he’s a tory cu nt or just your average, run of the mill cu nt, tbh mate. 

Just now, Cardiff_Fox said:

Worthy mentioning Hancock’s reaction to Ferguson...asked for police intervention 

 uh oh