treer

12 minutes ago, Charl91 said:

Has your mum put a cap on your account?

don't really understand your comment

But it is pretty obvious that my post is completely over your head

3 minutes ago, ScouseFox said:

cos he’s better 

ok, good reasoning

well he obvoiusly a loser overall, else the bookies woud not allow him to bet in £10 stakes.

I have many betfred accounts and the maximum bet allows a win figure of £5( so at 150/1 odds my stake would have been 4 pence.

I would sign Chris Kavanagh, if we had signed him in the summer we would be 6 points nearer Liverpool

He is the biggest homer big team ref you will ever come across.

On 25/10/2019 at 22:12, ScouseFox said:

backed harvey barnes to score, score two and score a hat trick. we won 9-0. all of our forward players scored at least once. harvey didn’t. cheers. 

why would you bet Harvey, instead of Vardy?

9 hours ago, Deeg67 said:

Title is out of reach

are you having a laugh?,

Don't think think for one minute that your view is shared by anyone at the club, 

They will be buzzing.

1 hour ago, Eamonn said:

That's just Betfair's take on it, though. I appreciate they are a multi-national who spend gazillions spying on their customers.  But they'll also factor in the volume of bets for each club, which means bigger clubs will get shorter prices.

he is on the about the betfair exchange, his post is correct, it is absolutely not what you suggest.

In fact it is where the bookies derive their odds from.

Leicester have recorded the biggest-ever victory by an away side in an English top-flight league match in the 131-year history of the Football League

On 20/10/2019 at 12:15, The Horse's Mouth said:

Hes pretty dogs lets be honest shouldve bought a proper winger 

What a judge!!!

Do people really think that we would loan out Hamza, or is this some kind of windup?

While we are at it maybe could do a double loan and Include Vardy as well.

He is better than Kane when it comes to winning Premier League titles.

I think people underestimate Hamza, it is only the fact that Ndidi is performing so well, that keeps him from a regular spot.

Very similiar players, think Hamza edges it going forward, Wilf defensively.

By the end of season, big problem for City to devise a way to play with both, because another 9 months, Hamza will have the vultures circling, if not a regular

As for Dier, no way would City be interested, he has nothing to offer that we do not already have in abundance.

6 hours ago, surrifox said:

well that's something I'll try to live with . made easier by never placing a bet on football in my life.

probably for the best.

On 21/10/2019 at 00:27, Dan LCFC said:

I'm sure they were somethng like 13/2 at home to Man City in April.

 

Few years ago on the last day of the season they were underdogs at home to Crystal Palace  they actually won that game as well.

2017 man utd 2 palace 0

Man U were favourite, it was palace who were the underdogs.

So you are saying we should be more worried about West Ham and Everton, than Chelsea and Spurs.

Your view is for sure, different to the betting markets, you should be able to make a few bob there.

28 minutes ago, KrefelderFox666 said:

Good post, a lot of people are getting a little carried away.

 

Couldn't disagree more, I think a lot of people are underestimating how much potential their is.

Champions League quali is imperative, gives us a lot better chance of keeping squad together, and also attracting new players.

Apart from poor ref at Anfield media would have us in the mix for top spot

The decision to penalise Perez and deny Vardy a one on one in the 85 min was worse than than the Watford non penalty against the bottlers. It just wasn't on tv

1 hour ago, Stevosevic said:

Win Friday and I'll be thinking we're in a top four race....

which teams are you thinking are in top 4 race at the moment?

14 minutes ago, Countryfox said:

then I believe we would be seriously challenging for top 4 and not top 6.    

you are little behind the times, we are already challenging for top 4,current odds are 3.6 (27%)

you will be even more more angry if you watch this link,go the 85minute when it is still 1-1

http://fullmatchsports.com/liverpool-vs-leicester-city-full-match-highlights/?tab=second-half

I bid £20

They are briliant, their knowledge and stats are  superb, all they have to do is bet against Leicester with the bookies.

If they are right they will clean up, if it is bullshit they lose, so simple.

3 hours ago, Nicolo Barella said:

I really hope Soyuncu had nothing to do with the military salute Demiral and some of the others took. Disgusting behaviour.

It is against uefa rules they were repimanded and warned not to, but still they did.

Uefa need to do something, but it wouldn't be disgusting to the Turkish culture per se, unlike the Bulgarian behaviour, which would be seen as disgusting to the vast majority of Bulgarians.

8 minutes ago, MC Prussian said:

No Republicans, no Independents

by the sound of it, they would be in a right mess if they had

At this rate, in about 18 months when Utd realise how good Cags is, City will be in line for £200M

8 hours ago, messerschmitt said:

Just to stir things up even more, the "foul" on Mane was at about 92 min 17 sec of a minimum of 4 mins of added time. The restart was at about 95 min 19 sec and Kavanagh blew after another 45 seconds. By my calculations we played less than 3 minutes of a minimum of 4. 

yes, but by that time Liverpool had scored, so the full four minutes were not needed.