Corky

16 hours ago, StanSP said:

I do give a shit thank you very much! 

 

 

 

Sorry Stan, didn't mean you

I like this notion that loads of MPs were in a real quandary about which was to vote then heard this and they all went one way.

33 minutes ago, FoyleFox said:

No intention of paying the PPV fees. The disparity between charges for clubs is already apparent and disproportionate. We are at the higher end of the scale for being shafted.

 

 

This was always going to happen. I don't buy the argument that it's cheaper than going to matches too which I've heard- you are one of 30k people going to a stadium with us. Potentially millions could be buying the games on PPV, that is an unlimited market.

Shit kick-off times and an extra £15 a week for some fans.

2 minutes ago, goose2010 said:

Have BT made their selections yet? If not wouldn't be surprised if the Liverpool game is on there. 

They have- they've got all the 12.30pm Saturday matches in November.

3 hours ago, Angus Scott said:

Amazingly the match at Liverpool on 21st has not been selected

We're going to be on twice on PPV as it stands, Liverpool and Fulham.

17 hours ago, StanSP said:

What

 

****ing hell, Nigel Farage has come out of this episode better than you lot, stop digging and admit you don't give a shit.

Rodgers didn't seem too impressed with the performance.

I like that honesty.

Fair play to him for running away and turning back on a throw in to us.

Comfortable enough, pounced on mistakes and punished them. Barnes was tremendous. Final 20 minutes was like a pre-season game but we could rest some for a bit with the game done.

And we got the Big Wes/ Little Wes combination too  

Hope Emile was bollocking Kasper about his kicking in that first half from the stands.

Probably been mentioned plenty of times but what's with the West Ham soundtrack?

That will hopefully do Barnes the world of good, just needs to relax more in front of goal. Iheanacho has linked well.

We've sent the best and worst of Schmeichel, scoreline probably better than performance but we'll take it. We need it.

It's not necessarily about where we finish, I'm fed up of the lifeless displays we are showing on a regular basis. I fully accept we'll lose but we lose in the limpest way possible. I'm delighted we smack teams and entertain at times but we've really got to cut out the turgid football.

LIVING RENT FREE IN PEP'S BALD HEAD

8 hours ago, Bellend Sebastian said:

While I'm sympathetic to current students in as much as they certainly aren't having the university experience they expected or hoped for, the state of these:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-54631524

 

They're not even the first students in LENTON to be hit with the biggest fine

You have to feel for them, their fun being stopped whilst everyone else is allowed to carry on as normal doing what they want.

2 hours ago, Unabomber said:

This is truly shameful. 

At least another four years of this shite to come as well.

Bernabeu's had a hell of a makeover.

Nah, they got up on a technicality in terms of getting into the play-offs (and played well in them) but the squad lacks quality and they haven't got the money to do anything major.

I'd argue that a lot of the supposed glamour games in this league have lost their appeal. Does Man United v Arsenal really get the biggest billing now? A few years ago Neville was playing down Liverpool v Man United when it was 6th v 4th. Man City v Arsenal is almost a routine Man City win now, same with Arsenal at Anfield.

Liverpool v Man City is the big game now, the Manchester derby still has an appeal, the North London derby is usually a good match but even in the top six games you get one-sided, routine wins or unexciting contests between a pair of former heavyweights.

Why do we always seem to head into European games on the back of crap league results?

I think we lost every game before a group match in 2016.

I'm glad the Liverpool owners are heavily involved again. If it had just been the Glazers they'd get the usual kicking but Henry and co are popular within the media so hopefully they'll get their share of the flak.

At least we can finally put to bed this notion that cutting domestic games is to help players with their fitness. It is to create space for more European games.

Amazingly, people were backing the reduction of 20 to 18 in that Big Picture bollocks. For ****s sake, if 38 matches in 40 weeks is too much, what do you want?

Are they still planning to give £200 million of everyone else's money to the lower leagues if this goes ahead?

1 hour ago, Dan LCFC said:

When did Maddison last do what Barkley did yesterday? Grab the game by the scruff of the neck and win the game?

 

He cannot be considered our star player until he's doing things like that. Tielemans is the same. Tielemans hasn't scored from open play in a year.

Tottenham last season? He played really well against Arsenal too.

His on-pitch stuff, at times, is more frustrating than his off-pitch. He needs to release the ball quicker, stop turning into trouble and going to ground easily. Off the pitch I think he speaks really well and apparently was very vocal and supportive during the restart when he wasn't playing. And he's pissed off The Sun which should gain plenty of plus points.

2 hours ago, Vacamion said:

 

These truly are the end times...

 

 

 

Vigil Van Dijk