Sublime_Coatsworth Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 15 minutes ago, Ricey said: Disappointing, yet understandible when you're dealing with pedantic and corrupt assholes. Our fault though. i bet the Leicester commercial team were slapping each other on the backs on Thursday evening, congratulating each other on what a laugh it was getting so close to the deadline. Twats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheUltimateWinner Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 That's twice we've ****ed with silva now then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 13 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said: They can't change the price. He's already bought. I read one report saying the deal could fall through completely based on this issue. Dunno what the truth of it is though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacemunky Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 Every 14 seconds today I'm going to break something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnglishOxide Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 What would happen if we just ****ed them off and played him anyway? Its guaranteed that FIFA would look the other way if this concerned a 50m + transfer of a player involving a bigger club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox 4 Life Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 Just now, EnglishOxide said: What would happen if we just ****ed them off and played him anyway? Its guaranteed that FIFA would look the other way if this concerned a 50m + transfer of a player involving a bigger club. We would be playing an unregistered player and would probably end up with some kind of hefty fine and even a points deduction so unwise! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norwichfox Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 1 minute ago, spacemunky said: Every 14 seconds today I'm going to break something. Wind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackneyfox Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 4 minutes ago, Sublime_Coatsworth said: Our fault though. i bet the Leicester commercial team were slapping each other on the backs on Thursday evening, congratulating each other on what a laugh it was getting so close to the deadline. Twats. People are just making stuff up now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somebum Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 1 hour ago, Babylon said: Perhaps you'd like to explain further, because that makes absolutely no sense. You were asking the club to get in Silva regardless of DD leaving. I've just given you valid reasons as to why that might not be possible. You can't just bin them off and pretend they aren't there. It might not the the case, but it could be. The reasons are not valid, and that's what I'm telling you, what are you failing to understand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCP4Ever Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 18 minutes ago, frany104 said: So is he our player? He just wont be able to play till January? Hopefully, that can still be fixed, but yes, if this decision stands, and Leicester can't, or chooses not to loan him, he cannot play until 2018. 13 minutes ago, Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo said: Everyone outside of Portugal calls your club Sporting Lisbon, as the name otherwise only indicates the country which is ridiculous. We don't have England United FC or Britain Rovers FC. It's not ridiculous, it's our club's name. Is it right to call you Richard Williams when your name is Richard Stevens?? Just because most clubs have their cities in their name, doesn't mean all of them do, and that others should be called like that. You don't want to use the whole name, fine, just SCP. When I first started posting here, I wrongly wrote LFC, not knowing it the club was actually called Leicester City Football Club. I don't do that anymore, because that's what you should do, call things by their name, especially when they don't like the alternative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katieakita Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 Would be more of an insight to see exactly what rule we allegedly broke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPeakFox Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 1 minute ago, somebum said: The reasons are not valid, and that's what I'm telling you, what are you failing to understand That he disagrees with your assertion of fact, I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeGuy Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 4 minutes ago, EnglishOxide said: What would happen if we just ****ed them off and played him anyway? Its guaranteed that FIFA would look the other way if this concerned a 50m + transfer of a player involving a bigger club. Lol, this ain't a school courtyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox 4 Life Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 2 minutes ago, katieakita said: Would be more of an insight to see exactly what rule we allegedly broke We missed the deadline by 14 seconds i.e. FIFA did not receive the paperwork ahead of the deadline passing..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HybridFox Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 Thinking of all the ways 14 seconds could have been saved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inckley fox Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 5 minutes ago, Sublime_Coatsworth said: Disappointing, yet understandible when you're dealing with pedantic and corrupt assholes. Our fault though. i bet the Leicester commercial team were slapping each other on the backs on Thursday evening, congratulating each other on what a laugh it was getting so close to the deadline. Twats. Surely this is an example of them not being corrupt?! Yes, it's our fault. An act of unbelievable self-harm and not the first in the post-title era. I'm not doubting that the people who run our club remain committed, but the extent to which they're committed and where the priorities lie in the running of the club right now is another matter. I hope heads are seriously knocked together after this and, in the aftermath, we become a little more competent. Line your targets up for January and don't leave your business - in or out - until the merry-go-round is well underway. And, for our part, we have to go very easy on Shakespeare. If the arse falls out of this, then it's going to be very hard to point the finger at a boss who has top players sold and not replaced by the people who run the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katieakita Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 2 minutes ago, Fox 4 Life said: We missed the deadline but 14 seconds i.e. FIFA did not receive the paperwork ahead of the deadline passing..... But what does the rule state, what is the wording of this rule. Things can be put down to a simple misunderstanding would be useful to see which exact rule we allegedly broke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyleolly Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 Can't we disguise him and put king 10 on the back of his shirt nobody would know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 On the plus side... we're going to have a settled, well-rested international midfielder with a point to prove in a WC year coming into the side on the 1st Jan when everyone will be shattered from this year's hectic Christmas schedule. Just pray that Ndidi doesn't get injured before then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sylofox Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 14 hours ago, Wymeswold fox said: http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/41118927 14 fvcking seconds late ffs and that's if the time is set correct on the fvcking fax machine. But it's ok for shite refs to give/disallow goals incorrectly. Or give panalties that are outside the box. It's fine to cost clubs millions and trophies. But don't you dare be 14 fvcking seconds late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFS Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 Let's set fire to something FIFA related Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn Claw II Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 So 1am plus 14 seconds? Isn't this the same as the degea issue? I don't understand how we miss it yet he is still our player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 I actually think the FA might support us well and get this over the line you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrysalis Posted 6 September 2017 Share Posted 6 September 2017 still no blame on rudkin and his staff right? If we didnt haggle we would have done it in time. So whatever we saved from haggling be it 5 million or whatever it seems we lost the player for at least 6 months. Is it worth it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.