Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Ashley

Chris Mepham

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, ronnup said:

You don’t get anything for 2.6 million these days. He’s young , English and has a lot of promise. When you think what we’re saying Maguire is worth, this lad is worth a tenth surely. 10 good premier league games he’s worth twice that already. A good season and it’s 40 mill 

 

Whoever you're on about they're both Welsh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd think after last year the last thing Rudkin would do is leave signings until the last few days. I bet he's in his office now, staring at the fax machine, replacement parts stacked up besides it, the work experience boy next door testing the backup power supply.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, weller54 said:

It's what the club does with all that profit though isn't it? 

Mahrez for example.. 60m and how much of that spent on his 'replacement '...Ghezzel.. 10M!

A big downgrade. 

If Maguire is sold (75m) and he's replaced with Mepham (15/20m) that's another big downgrade... So Where's the £100/110m left over from these two deals going?.. 

The team is far weaker and increases our chances of relegation considerably. 

 

Was it a big downgrade when we bought Mahrez for whoever he replaced?

 

 

4 hours ago, AKCJ said:

The Mahrez money has been spent.

 

5m on Ghezzal.

20m on Maddison

20m on Ricardo

12m on Ward

3.5m on Evans

 

 

This. It's actually an incredible upgrade isn't it.

 

Maddison alone probably

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, FIF said:

Was it a big downgrade when we bought Mahrez for whoever he replaced?

 

 

This. It's actually an incredible upgrade isn't it.

 

Maddison alone probably

Fairly good point. We've massively upgraded our right back, one of our centre halfs, gained two players who can play right wing and have someone who's looking like England's next creative midfielder. We haven't replaced Mahrez but we have successfully dealt with the three very weak areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Saxondale said:

We've got five quality players with the Mahrez money...

 

...but you can still only field 11 players at a time.

Okazaki, Simpson, Mahrez, Morgan

or  Maddison, Pereira, Ghezzel,  Evans

 

I'm not sure which 4 I would chose, depends on Ghezzel, but if he turns out to be alright then we will be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Gerard said:

 

Because you obviously have blind faith and I judge on evidence.

Did you judge on evidence with Mahrez ? or Kante? or any of the other great players who arrive with no big portfolio? thought not.

Edited by Bunyip
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saxondale said:

We've got five quality players with the Mahrez money...

 

...but you can still only field 11 players at a time.

Why is it with the mahrez money 

after what we achieved in previous seasons we should be splashing that amount to improve anyway 

 

Fulham 

wolves 

West Ham 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, AKCJ said:

The Mahrez money has been spent.

 

5m on Ghezzal.

20m on Maddison

20m on Ricardo

12m on Ward

3.5m on Evans

 

 

I think it’s mahrez money well spent when you actually look at the figures and names. Now we can spend some of our own money bringing in the last 3 ??

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SheppyFox said:

I think it’s mahrez money well spent when you actually look at the figures and names. Now we can spend some of our own money bringing in the last 3 ??

besides Ward being very questionable, that's about as well as you can spend that sort of money in this current crazy market.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...