Jump to content
justfoxes

Arsenal 1 -1 Leicester post match thread

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

hahahaha that one on the left.

 

Looks like he's been thrown through the Arsenal club shop.

 

He's 50 years old

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Points at the Emirates are as rare as hen’s teeth, so can’t really grumble.

 

Shame we shat the bed in the last 10 mins though. They were on their backs, legs ackimbo, but we stood around trying to get a bit of fluff out of our navel.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


I find this so so strange. They don’t take into account we’ve robbed every time we’ve been there since 2014. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TheUltimateWinner said:

Deserved to win lol 


there were vastly the better side in the first half, Kasper and their inability to take their chances was the only reason we weren’t dead and buried at HT tbf. Second half was a little more even and obviously once down to 10 we were on top.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said:


there were vastly the better side in the first half, Kasper and their inability to take their chances was the only reason we weren’t dead and buried at HT tbf. Second half was a little more even and obviously once down to 10 we were on top.

for 20 mins of the first half

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, WigstonWanderer said:

Points at the Emirates are as rare as hen’s teeth, so can’t really grumble.

Even when there's no crowd noise? 

 

Oh, wait....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said:


there were vastly the better side in the first half, Kasper and their inability to take their chances was the only reason we weren’t dead and buried at HT tbf. Second half was a little more even and obviously once down to 10 we were on top.

First 20 we could have been 1 up from the Nacho corner, they then score with their first decent chance and we've had our equaliser ruled out. Then for the last 20mins Kasper kept us properly in the game. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Spudulike said:

Arsenal not winning last night has strengthened Man City's case. If, as now looks most probable, either City or Wolves get 5th place then the establishment will prefer one of their preferred clubs being included in the cosy UCL group. 

You really think CAS would be swayed by that?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, UniFox21 said:

First 20 we could have been 1 up from the Nacho corner, they then score with their first decent chance and we've had our equaliser ruled out. Then for the last 20mins Kasper kept us properly in the game. 

Yeah but beyond Lacazette's headed miss, their chances at the end of the first half weren't super clear cut either. Just a flurry of half chances (at best - maybe quarter chances!) and long range shots.

They definitely created more in the first half, but more by quantity than consistent quality. They just kept hitting us on the counter with silky passing, but without much end product.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said:


I find this so so strange. They don’t take into account we’ve robbed every time we’ve been there since 2014. 

This is exactly what is wrong with Arsenal. You play for Arsenal. ARSENAL. Would you see guys like Adams, Henry, Viera etc. Putting up comments like this after a 1-1. Never. They would be fuming with themselves for not getting the win, against anybody. Such weak individuals at that club that steal a living. They did the same after the 2-1 against us with the daft picture. Such a poor mentality.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

three at the back is OK when you are playing a team you will dominate. Last night it gave arsenal too much space on the wings and even to chip over the three.  I hope we will not repeat this formation against better opposition.

 

When we looked in trouble Brendan did not fix it. We were lucky not to be 3 down at HT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, foxinsocks said:

three at the back is OK when you are playing a team you will dominate. Last night it gave arsenal too much space on the wings and even to chip over the three.  I hope we will not repeat this formation against better opposition.

 

When we looked in trouble Brendan did not fix it. We were lucky not to be 3 down at HT.

Yeah if we play with a back three again, we will probably need Ndidi sitting deeper to help the attacks that come down the wings.

We felt very exposed down the wings, particularly on our left.

Edited by Beechey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Beechey said:

Yeah if we play with a back three again, we will probably need Ndidi sitting deeper to help the attacks that come down the wings.

We felt very exposed down the wings, particularly on our left.

Hamsa and Ndidi in front.

 

If we are overrun then I think a flat four is better - he should have taken the wolves guy off and put fuchs on  middle of first half.  This all related to his apparent belief that youri is a holding mid!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:
 
 
 
Ridiculous, no way on earth that card gets rescinded 

 

There are four games left 

 

they probably don’t feel they have much to lose by appealing 

 

if he gets an extra game for a flippant appeal then he just misses the last fixture 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said:


I find this so so strange. They don’t take into account we’ve robbed every time we’ve been there since 2014. 

You know your football club is screwed when your own players think they deserved to win a game that they didn't deserve to win 😂

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 4everfox said:

You know your football club is screwed when your own players think they deserved to win a game that they didn't deserve to win 😂

They could have won it by half time... but they didn't coz they are so poor. Arteta must be itching to get to a transfer window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, foxinsocks said:

They could have won it by half time... but they didn't coz they are so poor. Arteta must be itching to get to a transfer window.

It doesn't mean they deserved to win. I thought a draw was a fair result based on the 90 minutes

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, foxinsocks said:

Hamsa and Ndidi in front.

 

If we are overrun then I think a flat four is better - he should have taken the wolves guy off and put fuchs on  middle of first half.  This all related to his apparent belief that youri is a holding mid!

Back three, two Dms and two wingbacks, where are the goals going to come from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TheUltimateWinner said:

Deserved to win lol 

Sums the team up.

Edited by sm1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A draw was a fair result but we had the ball in the back of the net twice and they had it in there once. One of our two being incorrectly ruled out, so any talk of them ‘deserving’ to win is very, very bizarre. True result should’ve been 2-1 City.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, foxinsocks said:

Hamsa and Ndidi in front.

 

If we are overrun then I think a flat four is better - he should have taken the wolves guy off and put fuchs on  middle of first half.  This all related to his apparent belief that youri is a holding mid!

Really should have started Praet instead of Perez , stronger utility player . Away to Arsenal with their fast , class attackers you need to be pragmatic.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Manwell Pablo said:


there were vastly the better side in the first half, Kasper and their inability to take their chances was the only reason we weren’t dead and buried at HT tbf. Second half was a little more even and obviously once down to 10 we were on top.

 

They were vastly better for 25 minutes of the first half, after 15 minutes of not being able to get it out of their own half.

 

Us being on top 'once down to 10' amounted to almost 25 minutes of play. It's hard to be sure what you're saying with 'was a little more even' for the first part of the second half, but I read it as 'but Arsenal were still better'. IMO we looked more threatening before the red card.

 

Possession was 60-40 to us. Shot/shots on target almost identical.

 

It's really not a poor call to question whether they deserved a win at our expense.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...