Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Shane said:

Man Utd get a penalty after the final whistle, Chelsea handball before the 3rd goal. VAR is a joke

The incident occurred before the final whistle, So its valid, Brighton should know better. However, Man Utd robbed those points.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Paddy. said:

Weird that Chelsea and United have both been saved by highly contentious VAR decisions deep into added-on time in games they deserved to lose ON THE SAME DAY. It is really is a strange coincidence.

 

 

Can't wait for 90+8 minutes tomorrow afternoon... :unsure:

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, surrifox said:

Why - for scrambling a draw against one of the relegation favourites after spending millions ?

Yep they’ll go on about what a tactical  genius he is for changing it up and getting back in the game and how they deserved it and could  have gone on to win it whilst ignoring all the other facts about the game . 

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

 

So now it has to be in the immediate buildup to the goal. But to me that is the immediate build up, if he doesn't hit that with his arm, the control isn't good enough for the pass for the goal

Apparently because the West Brom player made a “clearance” it’s a new phase so the handball wasn’t in the immediate buildup to the goal 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jammie82uk said:

Apparently because the West Brom player made a “clearance” it’s a new phase so the handball wasn’t in the immediate buildup to the goal 

So the attacking team can handle the ball in a penalty area scramble but if it doesn't lead directly to a goal it's not hand ball? I'm confused

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Milo said:

Can't wait for 90+8 minutes tomorrow afternoon... :unsure:

As I said earlier today some would same not me, that the league is as bent as a two pound note

 

some would say and not me, that they will protect the big four or five at all costs

 

and some would say other fans would be delighted when these teams **** off and join their own super league

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, davieG said:

So the attacking team can handle the ball in a penalty area scramble but if it doesn't lead directly to a goal it's not hand ball? I'm confused

It is handball but VAR only looks at one phase of play before the goal. When a defender has a chance to clear the ball that changes the phase of play. Therefore the alleged handball didn't occur in the same phase of play so VAR can't look at it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, peach0000 said:

Anyone complaining about the decisions of VAR or the on field officials with the handballs or lack off today clearly don't understand the rules of the game. The problem is with the rules not the officials. The officials have got all the handball decisions 100% right today.

Thanks fergie

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, peach0000 said:

It is handball but VAR only looks at one phase of play before the goal. When a defender has a chance to clear the ball that changes the phase of play. Therefore the alleged handball didn't occur in the same phase of play so VAR can't look at it.

laughable change to the law

 

it defies common sense. IFAB are a bunch of clueless muppets.

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Paddy. said:

Weird that Chelsea and United have both been saved by highly contentious VAR decisions deep into added-on time in games they deserved to lose ON THE SAME DAY. It is really is a strange coincidence.

 

 

It's, almost like the evil forces of betting syndicates and or backhanders are at work 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, davieG said:

So the attacking team can handle the ball in a penalty area scramble but if it doesn't lead directly to a goal it's not hand ball? I'm confused

I with you mate, I don’t get it either, I understand the rules but I don’t get how we can be in a even worse position then last year 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, twister said:

laughable change to the law

 

it defies common sense. IFAB are a bunch of clueless muppets.

Can't disagree with that at all. Handball is always going to be subjective. Was no need to start fiddling with the laws.

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, davieG said:

So the attacking team can handle the ball in a penalty area scramble but if it doesn't lead directly to a goal it's not hand ball? I'm confused

 

22 minutes ago, peach0000 said:

It is handball but VAR only looks at one phase of play before the goal. When a defender has a chance to clear the ball that changes the phase of play. Therefore the alleged handball didn't occur in the same phase of play so VAR can't look at it.

It isn’t actually handball - if it was handball then a free kick would be awarded .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...