ealingfox 5,238 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October The problem isn't that it's a nose-hair offside. I actually don't have a problem with those ones. The problem is that it's not offside full stop. Look at the stills of that ffs, state of those lines. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Corky 12,053 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Which part of him that he can score with is offside? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jattdogg 2,722 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Just now, Corky said: Which part of him that he can score with is offside? He farted at that exact moment causing his shorts to flare at the back crack which put him offside Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jammie82uk 1,447 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Just now, Corky said: Which part of him that he can score with is offside? Shoulder apparently due to the new handball rule Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martyn 1,296 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October (edited) We've had hairline calls like that since the start of last season, why all the talk about the game being finished now? Is that the first VAR call to cost Liverpool points? Edited 17 October by martyn 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
UniFox21 6,869 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October 2 minutes ago, ealingfox said: The problem isn't that it's a nose-hair offside. I actually don't have a problem with those ones. The problem is that it's not offside full stop. Look at the stills of that ffs, state of those lines. 1 minute ago, Corky said: Which part of him that he can score with is offside? Angle they've given us doesn't do any favours at all Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ARTY_FOX 1,311 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October People complain about laws that can be interpreted in different ways but offside is about the only black and white rule. Offside is offside for me. Wouldnt be mad if that was against us and would be if it wasn't given against a team we were playing I mean before this was bought in and people would have a toe off people were moaning about linesman needing help for literally this tight of a call. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sdb 2,430 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October 3 minutes ago, ealingfox said: The problem isn't that it's a nose-hair offside. I actually don't have a problem with those ones. The problem is that it's not offside full stop. Look at the stills of that ffs, state of those lines. Madness. Something genuinely dubious about VAR today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ARTY_FOX 1,311 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October 3 minutes ago, Corky said: Which part of him that he can score with is offside? I guess if you're going with the T-shirt line that they've implemented then that part of his arm? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Corky 12,053 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October 1 minute ago, ARTY_FOX said: I guess if you're going with the T-shirt line that they've implemented then that part of his arm? Looking at the picture Bugg posted, isn't he level with the defender next to him? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sdb 2,430 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October I dislike Liverpool a fair amount, but I'm properly annoyed for them today. What the hell is football becoming?! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
st albans fox 8,139 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Klopp’s face when the interviewer said he couldn’t work out why it was offside ..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
UniFox21 6,869 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Phrase "potential leg breaker" is really overused now. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ARTY_FOX 1,311 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Just now, Corky said: Looking at the picture Bugg posted, isn't he level with the defender next to him? No. Granted I zoomed in because I'm on my phone and it's too small to tell, but it isn't level with Keane. Looks worse with the thicker lines too, we know that. But off is off if they didn't go into depth with it we wouldn't have had nachos winner vs Everton last year for example. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
UniFox21 6,869 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Just now, st albans fox said: Klopp’s face when the interviewer said he couldn’t work out why it was offside ..... Poor from BT, trying to piss Klopp off for a reaction on camera Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hoopla10 52 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October VAR needs binning. I'm embarrassed to say I was an initial advocate of VAR and I'm sure in the right hands it could be used for the good but clearly whoever is making the decisions (overall rules and second to second gameplay) they're all muppets. I'm not even sure how the pen' wasn't given as he didn't look offside. And Pickford should have walked. It's just a carcrash of mistakes. Looking forward to listening to Leicester play next.... oh no that's right we get bumped to Sunday evening so the broadcasters can milk the fans for all they're worth. This game is slowly going to pot... speaking of which. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bats8711 303 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October 10 minutes ago, ealingfox said: The problem isn't that it's a nose-hair offside. I actually don't have a problem with those ones. The problem is that it's not offside full stop. Look at the stills of that ffs, state of those lines. Right. Offside is offside. Even if it’s just by a little. Where do you draw the line? The actual line - that’s where you draw the line. If half of your foot is offside then so be it. The issue is I would like to actually see that it’s offside. These lines don’t do that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Corky 12,053 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October In the days before VAR, there's no way that is even mentioned post-match. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
st albans fox 8,139 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October 1 minute ago, Bats8711 said: Right. Offside is offside. Even if it’s just by a little. Where do you draw the line? The actual line - that’s where you draw the line. If half of your foot is offside then so be it. The issue is I would like to actually see that it’s offside. These lines don’t do that But they do - the red line is either in front or behind the blue one ......the question I have is when they freeze the frame ....when is the ball actually played ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Bear 3,395 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October 2 minutes ago, Bats8711 said: Right. Offside is offside. Even if it’s just by a little. Where do you draw the line? The actual line - that’s where you draw the line. If half of your foot is offside then so be it. The issue is I would like to actually see that it’s offside. These lines don’t do that If they took the suggestion of making the lines wider then it would be noticeable at least. Which is what we all want. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
trabuch 2,125 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Just now, st albans fox said: But they do - the red line is either in front or behind the blue one ......the question I have is when they freeze the frame ....when is the ball actually played ? Exactly. It can't be mm accurate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bats8711 303 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Just now, The Bear said: If they took the suggestion of making the lines wider then it would be noticeable at least. Which is what we all want. Lol what? Wider? That’s the opposite of what I want. Those lines should be razor thin. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
st albans fox 8,139 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Just now, trabuch said: Exactly. It can't be mm accurate. If the freeze is consistent across every single check then that’s ok but how would you do that ??. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NaijaFox 866 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October 13 minutes ago, jammie82uk said: Shoulder apparently due to the new handball rule But his shoulder wasn’t off. The most you could argue would be his elbow, and he cannot score with that. Don’t particularly care LiVARpool, and to be fair they’ve gotten more than their fair share of VAR favors, but they were robbed today (starting from the Pickford non-call). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TheUltimateWinner 6,398 Posted 17 October Report Share Posted 17 October Imagine paying £14.99 to watch a ridiculous call like that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.