Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

How good he was for us? He had a decent first season for us but that final season he was mediocre at best. We finished 9th both seasons and shipped a fair amount of goals, he's no more memorable than Spencer Prior was. In fact at least Prior won something here.

 

Did you pick Spencer Prior because it rhymes with Maguire?  :ph34r:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jattdogg said:

I dont like Liverpool but that challenge by Pickford is about 3 reds in 1. I dont understand why keepers make such terrible tackles. Would you want someone to do the same to your own players? Should be forced to miss the same amount of time as VVD. Dirty cvnt.

I haven't seen it and don't really care. However, I'm enjoying listening to the Klopp bleating after how happy he was with the officials after Mane's dive last season for Fenway Red Sox. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

I haven't seen it and don't really care. However, I'm enjoying listening to the Klopp bleating after how happy he was with the officials after Mane's dive last season for Fenway Red Sox. 

Ya we can all agree on mane diving but i hate to see players injured like that for 0 reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, st albans fox said:

Thats not a clear and obvious error - they’re re refereeing the game - it’s wrong !!

The idea of clear and obvious is so subjective it allows them to ignore some and not others. If they don't want to give a penalty they ignore it, if they do they'll just say it was clear and obvious.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Love it

 

unpopular opinion (probably) but that’s a foul. It’s in the box. So its a pen. I do take that it’s not a “clear and obvious error” the way most would think in the flow of play, but once you actually start looking at it - it’s a foul. Just have to hope it’s consistently applied. 

 

To add - another chance to point out how ridiculous it is that VAR doesnt play full speed replays when reviewing for possible fouls. 

Edited by Bats8711
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Bats8711 said:

Love it

 

unpopular opinion (probably) but that’s a foul. It’s in the box. So its a pen. I do take that it’s not a “clear and obvious error” the way most would think in the flow of play, but once you actually start looking at it - it’s a foul. Just have to hope it’s consistently applied. 

 

To add - another chance to point out how ridiculous it is that VAR doesnt play full speed replays when reviewing for possible fouls. 

It doesn’t matter that it’s a foul in your opinion (or even the ref if he looked at it again) 

the ref didn’t give it 

so unless he has made a huge mistake not to give it then the on field decision stays as it is 

100/100 people have to think that it’s a pen for it to be a clear and obvious error 

It wasn’t one of those 

 

VAR is not supposed to ‘re referee ‘ the game 

 

it’s there to correct clear errors re pens/goals and to judge if a goal is valid or if a sending off should/shouldn’t happen 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...