Jump to content

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

If he came here he'd get in the England squad, no doubt about it.

 

Dyche was right the other day - both Tarkowski and McNeil (the latter for the under21s) - should have been selected.

Did you see the starting line up the other night for the U21's? lol People who should be in that team aren't getting in until Boothroyd.... dies?

 

nb: I know they won 6-0 but it was only Kosovo

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

£54m in Thai Baht is ฿2,243,133,779.

 

Which, if you convert it back to pounds, is still £54m.

 

I don't think we've thought this all the way through.

Just ignore the pound sign that I didn't mean to include.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

To be totally fair to Burnley, 54M for Tarkowski makes much more sense that 80M for Slabhead.  But - just like we had Manures pants down, I would hate us to have the same done to us again by Burnley.  Sporting bent us over in recent years and our business since has been excellent.  Move on Rudders.

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

To be totally fair to Burnley, 54M for Tarkowski makes much more sense that 80M for Slabhead.  But - just like we had Manures pants down, I would hate us to have the same done to us again by Burnley.  Sporting bent us over in recent years and our business since has been excellent.  Move on Rudders.

With two years left on his contract, they are deluded if they think they can get that. Next summer they'll be happy to get £20m for him.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Babylon said:

With two years left on his contract, they are deluded if they think they can get that. Next summer they'll be happy to get £20m for him.

I’d push the boat out for Tarkowski

He’s a very solid CB and would make a big difference to our team

A CB pair of Caglar and Tarkowski would be fine 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Babylon said:

With two years left on his contract, they are deluded if they think they can get that. Next summer they'll be happy to get £20m for him.

Tarkowski is their best player whereas when maguire left he was our 9th best player in our starting lineup. Unless they have a replacement that they know will be top quality lined up theyre probably happy to wait out his contract rather than get a measly 20 mil for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, frany104 said:

No he wasn’t. He was probably our 4th best player. Stop with this rubbish about Maguire being no good. We got a great price for him but he’s a top player.

Not during 2018/19 he wasn't, had a very mediocre season. His 1st season with us he was superb though.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, frany104 said:

No he wasn’t. He was probably our 4th best player. Stop with this rubbish about Maguire being no good. We got a great price for him but he’s a top player.

In that season he was the 4th best defender in our back 4, Chilwell marginally better but Evans and Ricardo obviously so. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

Tarkowski is their best player whereas when maguire left he was our 9th best player in our starting lineup. Unless they have a replacement that they know will be top quality lined up theyre probably happy to wait out his contract rather than get a measly 20 mil for him.

It’s Burnley, they aren’t going to want to lose him on a free.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TommyK said:

If they don't sell him this year, they'll get less next. Another year older, only one year left on his contract. 

Not necessarily, Castagne being an example.

 

They accepted £18m last season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...