Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, mozartfox said:

Please W Ham get this over one the line and then bid for Vestagaard.

Forget it.  Burnley have 3 centre halves at the club and one of them is injured.  We aren't selling Tarkowski unless it's for silly money, and £22m net after Brentford get 27.5% does not qualify as silly money.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, happy85 said:

West Ham ready to pay Arsenal £5m to seal Rob Holding loan | Alan Nixon

 

West Ham dropped out of signing Tarkowski 

 

Holding is a decent signing, I suggested him ages ago. He'd have been fine for us as a 3rd CB, but wouldn't solve the long term issue of needing another one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, dsr-burnley said:

Forget it.  Burnley have 3 centre halves at the club and one of them is injured.  We aren't selling Tarkowski unless it's for silly money, and £22m net after Brentford get 27.5% does not qualify as silly money.

How much did you pay for Tarkowski?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, hackneyfox said:

How much did you pay for Tarkowski?

Hardly relevant.  We paid buttons for Mahrez but we wouldn't sell him for less than the absolute maximum we could extract.

 

27.5% is a huge sell on fee.  A lesson there for selling clubs.  You have to make the sell on fee reasonable otherwise you'll never get it.  It makes sense for Burnley to just keep him for the remainder of his contract.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, murphy said:

Hardly relevant.  We paid buttons for Mahrez but we wouldn't sell him for less than the absolute maximum we could extract.

 

27.5% is a huge sell on fee.  A lesson there for selling clubs.  You have to make the sell on fee reasonable otherwise you'll never get it.  It makes sense for Burnley to just keep him for the remainder of his contract.  

Very relevant as the sell on fee is based on the profit, not the full fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, murphy said:

Hardly relevant.  We paid buttons for Mahrez but we wouldn't sell him for less than the absolute maximum we could extract.

 

27.5% is a huge sell on fee.  A lesson there for selling clubs.  You have to make the sell on fee reasonable otherwise you'll never get it.  It makes sense for Burnley to just keep him for the remainder of his contract.  

Perhaps it was a genuine question? Who are you to decide what’s relevant to another individual? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, casablancas said:

Perhaps it was a genuine question? Who are you to decide what’s relevant to another individual? 

Relevant to Burnley as in the buying price being relevant to the asking price but thanks for that anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Daveb5569 said:

would be taking a step back if he went to West ham team and club in turmoil 

Cant see him going there, it's not exactly a step up in terms of league position and or chance of winning silverware. Only reason he might go is if he was getting a huge pay rise. Depends on whether hes motivated by money or by career prospects. At 27 years old, his next move could make or break his career  

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, murphy said:

Oh, OK.  Well £3m apparently.

I've heard £3m, I've heard £6m.  Definitely, absolutely, no more than £6m.  It makes the purported £30m receipt into £22.5m or £23.4m, so not significantly different in terms of decision making on whether to sell.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, murphy said:


Burnley first quoted the Hammers £50m for Tarkowski, having rejected a bid of £40m from Leicester last summer, but it is understood that an offer of around £30m with add-ons would be enough to get a deal moving

 

 

 

didnt realize we bid that much for him..

Edited by MPH
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MPH said:


Burnley first quoted the Hammers £50m for Tarkowski, having rejected a bid of £40m from Leicester last summer, but it is understood that an offer of around £30m with add-ons would be enough to get a deal moving

 

 

 

didnt realize we bid that much for him..

Don't think it was quite that much. It was less than what we paid for tielemans I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...