Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Nickbluefox said:

Feels to me like we'd be going for our 4th choice, which seems like it's panic buying unfortunately. It's like saying 'We don't really want him, but he'll have to do, even though he costs more than our 1st, 2nd and 3rd choices' 🤷‍♂️

Ooh, now here's a thought, if we're willing to pay that kinda money for 4th choice, I tell you what,  let's go for the 1st or 2nd choice FFS 🤔🤔🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Pretty sure he was originally our first choice? Surprised they have rejected our bid anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said:

Just pay £40m for Fofana. Fofana will be worth £60m+ in a few years whereas Tarkowski will be worth nothing. 

Completely agree. No one will complain about a few million pounds more  for Fofana when he gets sold for a top 5 record fee for a defender in a few years. Trust the scouts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mickyblueeyes said:

We are just ****ing with West Ham. Pricks trying to follow what we do. Let’s just confuse the bastards.

Remember when Vichai refused to loan them Slimani because Brady had done spouted bollocks in her column about him buying wine just before sacking Ranieri?

 

I hope it's our policy to ruin the ****ers out of spite from now on.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, urban.spaceman said:

Remember when Vichai refused to loan them Slimani because Brady had done spouted bollocks in her column about him buying wine just before sacking Ranieri?

 

I hope it's our policy to ruin the ****ers out of spite from now on.

Maybe they took offence to WHU trying to muscle in on Fofana, and we thought ‘two can play that game’?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

Maybe they took offence to WHU trying to muscle in on Fofana, and we thought ‘two can play that game’?

Our brass have never been big fans of Brady and the Dildo Brothers.

Edited by The_77
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

Remember when Vichai refused to loan them Slimani because Brady had done spouted bollocks in her column about him buying wine just before sacking Ranieri?

 

I hope it's our policy to ruin the ****ers out of spite from now on.

Top: Dont care how much it costs, sign both!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...