Leicester_Loyal 3,975 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October 6 minutes ago, Peckfortonfox said: If that's true then fair play LCFC! 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Voll Blau 9,026 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October Credit where it's due to the club for voting against it. Insane that there are middling clubs out there who think their fans would actually accept this. What goes on in the heads of officials at Burnley, for example, in thinking their fans would endorse this crap? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
StanSP 23,893 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October Appreciate that from the club. Very surprising we were the only ones though. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The whole world smiles 4,417 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October What's the crack with iptv. Could someone pm a link? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sol thewall Bamba 7,307 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October Excellent from the club if that's the case. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post The whole world smiles 4,417 Posted 9 October Popular Post Report Share Posted 9 October Just now, StanSP said: Appreciate that from the club. Very surprising we were the only ones though. Especially when Liverpool give it the “more than a club" bollocks. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jevans 20 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October All the tight arses in here will have to go back to radio Leicester and teletext to follow the game and catch the highlights on match of the day at 2230. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
StanSP 23,893 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October Just now, The whole world smiles said: Especially when Liverpool give it the “more than a club" bollocks. And Everton being 'the people's club' 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
StanSP 23,893 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October Just now, Jevans said: All the tight arses in here will have to go back to radio Leicester and teletext to follow the game and catch the highlights on match of the day at 2230. You gonna pay for us? Help some fellow fans out? You seem to be rolling in the cash. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Xen 3,030 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October (edited) 6 minutes ago, goose2010 said: If that's true (no reason it wouldn't be) thry fair play to us. https://twitter.com/martynziegler/status/1314585749417844741? In a reply he says apparently Woodward voted in favour despite this, then quotes the JP tweet after that. Going to be some interesting to see what comes out from this... Edited 9 October by Xen Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sol thewall Bamba 7,307 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October Hmmm this tweet however kind of goes against what Percy has said. Why would Woodward propose free access for ST holders and then not vote against the proposals? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post ttfn 4,997 Posted 9 October Popular Post Report Share Posted 9 October £15 is profiteering from the clubs. Once again they’ve been given a chance to engage with their communities and chosen to rip them off instead. Also, I’m sure I’m not alone in having split the cost for PPV stuff before with friends. Not really an option at the moment, is it? (And not just because I have no friends) 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lcfc82 68 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October 11 minutes ago, Peckfortonfox said: Fair play to the club for this. absolutely disgusting that we were the only club to do this though. The others should be ashamed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post StanSP 23,893 Posted 9 October Popular Post Report Share Posted 9 October 2 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Fox92 11,091 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October 23 minutes ago, Peckfortonfox said: Well in lads Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Saxondale 1,326 Posted 9 October Popular Post Report Share Posted 9 October 15 minutes ago, Jevans said: All the tight arses in here will have to go back to radio Leicester and teletext to follow the game and catch the highlights on match of the day at 2230. Pipe down, Sultan of Brunei. 1 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Shaggy 16 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October 1 hour ago, TK95 said: I'm sorry £15 a game is an absolute joke on top of Sky/BT subscriptions Same me mate,just greedy bastards 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
urban fox 1,542 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October so if a game is scheduled to be televised on sky i can buy a now tv day pass for £9.99. if its not scheduled, then its £14.95? what sort of madness is that? call me a cynic but watch the now TV day pass price suddenly leap up overnight and sky will say that they have done it to be "fair" to supporters of all clubs who do not have access to satellite broadcasts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SemperEadem 2,493 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October Football at the top level in this country really is grim. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Xen 3,030 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October 1 minute ago, urban fox said: so if a game is scheduled to be televised on sky i can buy a now tv day pass for £9.99. if its not scheduled, then its £14.95? what sort of madness is that? call me a cynic but watch the now TV day pass price suddenly leap up overnight and sky will say that they have done it to be "fair" to supporters of all clubs who do not have access to satellite broadcasts. Yep exactly, said something similar in a post earlier. Even more ridiculous when you point out that the day pass gets you another 22 hours worth of sky sports on top of the match (so potentially triple the football, plus F1/rugby etc), whereas the PPV will just be the single game... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Corky 12,003 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October You really can't blame people for going for streams instead. I could understand if it was for a 3pm game and it would affect the lower/ non-league gates but to ask to pay more for matches on a Sunday evening? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Saxondale 1,326 Posted 9 October Popular Post Report Share Posted 9 October I've always said I'd be happy to pay-per-view if it was £5. That feels like the right amount to me. £15 is not far off the price of a match ticket. 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Captain... 7,695 Posted 9 October Popular Post Report Share Posted 9 October There also needs to be a fair distribution of games. Fans of unfashionable clubs shouldn't have to pay for more games. Bit of a shit show all round really. 11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
goody2028 1,062 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October Really needs to be an organised boycott of this. Can’t believe they charge this sort of price and then have the nerve to try and get streams banned, can you really blame people for turning to streaming? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
yorkie1999 4,232 Posted 9 October Report Share Posted 9 October 2 hours ago, Peckfortonfox said: It’s is but I did it for the West Ham game and justified it be thinking I’d be spending a lot more if I was actually going the game. Given the result I regret my decision They can't justify it, but say if you went to a live concert you'd be paying £100 and some, if you watch the video/stream it'd be a fiver, 20%. This lot are charging 70%. Fvckin rip off. It's almost as though they're making a point by over charging to justify not making pay per view viable because they numbers will be low. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.