Jump to content

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Grebfromgrebland said:

Am I the only one who doesn't really understand that

Each stat around the edge is per 90 minutes

 

The further from the centre the dot is the higher the rating the player has in that stat, the bigger the overall shape the better

 

Green is Under, Blue are McNeil and Brooks, and as you can see, Green is bigger than blue on both, suggesting Under statistically is much more effective at contributing to goals and assists then both McNeil and Brooks

 

Edited by moore_94
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Jobyfox said:

I think the green bit just needs to be bigger than the blue bit 

 

2 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Each stat around the edge is per 90 minutes

 

The further from the centre the dot is the higher the rating the player has in that stat, the bigger the overall shape the better

 

Green is Under, Blue are McNeil and Brooks, and as you can see, Green is bigger than blue on both, suggesting Under statistically is much more effective at contributing to goals and assists then both McNeil and Brooks

 

As I said 😀

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Each stat around the edge is per 90 minutes

 

The further from the centre the dot is the higher the rating the player has in that stat, the bigger the overall shape the better

 

Green is Under, Blue are McNeil and Brooks, and as you can see, Green is bigger than blue on both, suggesting Under statistically is much more effective at contributing to goals and assists then both McNeil and Brooks

 

This may come across as pedantry, but do you mean more  than “either” McNeill or Brooks? 

 

“Both” McNeill and Brooks might imply that Under’s stats were better than the others combined. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Jobyfox said:

This may come across as pedantry, but do you mean more  than “either” McNeill or Brooks? 

 

“Both” McNeill and Brooks might imply that Under’s stats were better than the others combined. 

You're right, that is pedantic! lol

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Billy Big Balls said:

Screenshot_20200917-152928_Chrome.jpg.23021729ac3f4a3195f155edb3192e7f.jpgScreenshot_20200917-152859_Chrome.jpg.4431fd2037501f7ac9701407397514e5.jpg

 

Comparisons to the other wingers we've been linked with, hopefully it'll relieve the people that have felt under-whelmed (I'm so sorry it just writes itself). 

:S and this tells us what?

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Sublime_Coatsworth said:

It’s really not complicated. Basically despite Brooke's' KP90 being under Unders, it was under it less that his SH90, which was considerably under Unders.

Image result for naile it

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...