Jump to content
happy85

James Maddison

Recommended Posts

The worrying thing is the fact he isn’t in the squad at all, especially considering there is a long gap between matches after today.

 

He’s just signed a new contract, but let’s hope he hasn’t insisted on a release clause in that contract.

 

If he has only signed on the condition that, for example, an £80m bid from a Champions League club will be accepted, we could have no control over this whatsoever........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything could be an issue. Plus nowadays they take tests.

 

Just because he's not in squad doesn't mean he's going anywhere. Plus he's just signed a 5 year deal so his value will be 80m-100m and United won't spend on Sancho because Dortmund are asking for "too much".

Edited by Fox92
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, happy85 said:

Mods don’t delete 

 

no Maddison in squad 

 

this is worrying

 

 

I’m sure if there was any truth in this, it would be leaked from bigger and more reliable sources, especially from United’s end, than just ‘Keith’ on Twitter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must be daft as a brush if you're thinking Maddison is off to United.

 

1) they don't need him. 

2) he signed a new contract literally a few weeks ago.

3) transfer window closes in 24 hours and we have no replacement lined up so would be over £100mill to compensate

4) they won't pay that for Sancho so why would they pay that for Maddison

5) Close Thread.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, City1884 said:

The worrying thing is the fact he isn’t in the squad at all, especially considering there is a long gap between matches after today.

 

He’s just signed a new contract, but let’s hope he hasn’t insisted on a release clause in that contract.

 

If he has only signed on the condition that, for example, an £80m bid from a Champions League club will be accepted, we could have no control over this whatsoever........

A release clause wouldn’t be active until after the first season of signing, be bloody ridiculous otherwise... giving we would have zero time to find a replacement. He signed the deal so Man U and the like wouldn’t bother

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, City1884 said:

The worrying thing is the fact he isn’t in the squad at all, especially considering there is a long gap between matches after today.

 

He’s just signed a new contract, but let’s hope he hasn’t insisted on a release clause in that contract.

 

If he has only signed on the condition that, for example, an £80m bid from a Champions League club will be accepted, we could have no control over this whatsoever........

A release clause doesn't mean he's off anyway. The player can still opt to stay.

 

Everyone at panic stations when transfer window closes tomorrow. A new 5yr deal + so close to transfer window closing would take a stupid bid for him to go.

 

And as I said above  they won't pay for Sancho so they ain't gonna bid the same for Maddison.

Edited by Fox92
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Man U just signed Cavani so are scraping the barrel, they haven’t signed Sancho because unwilling to place the big bid. Maddison would command a similar fee probably more now the window closes tomorrow lol 

Edited by foxes_rule1978
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, happy85 said:

It worth a thread. Even BBC Leicester sport are thinking the same !!

Because The moron who does the commentary got suckered in by a parody account. See posts in this thread.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, happy85 said:

Calf problem for Maddison, we're told. Injured in training this week, so not risked today. 

 

Mercury 

 

Do you believe everything you see on twitter?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ross 'LCFC' Turner said:

Man Utd won’t pay above 90 million for Sancho which is a position they actually need to strengthen, surely they aren’t going to pay over this for a player who plays in a position where they have Pogba & Fernandes, even Van de Beek can’t get a game! 

This is definitely the most convincing argument I've seen for this not happening. He would be pure padding for Man Utd and would cost a similar amount to their #1 target.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...