Blue-fox 397 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February You’d like to think he might have a chance to start Sunday if Brendan thinks he can change the game when chasing the game. Couldn’t be a worse option to try than playing Hamza and Ndidi together and pushing youri forward again. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LCFCbwoi 153 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 1 minute ago, Bert said: Didn’t say anything about his attitude? Fair enough, thought you was insinuating he had poor body language because that was a characteristic aimed at Gray Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ric Flair 22,818 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February At the very least this shows he is very much in the thinking of the manager whilst we have serious selection problems, as I said would be the case to @Finnegan There's more than enough there with him, he's got a great future in the game and we have to get him to sign a new deal now. Start him on Sunday, Choudhiry was abysmal tonight and Tielemans needs to be back deeper. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jaspa 2,215 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February (edited) Wasn't there a issue where he wanted game time and wouldn't sign a contract? Not seen enough of him to judge. I'll trust the sharp minds of here though who are obviously infatuated with him. Increases the chance we'll keep him. Edited 25 February by Jaspa Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Webbo 17,415 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 2 minutes ago, Blue-fox said: You’d like to think he might have a chance to start Sunday if Brendan thinks he can change the game when chasing the game. Couldn’t be a worse option to try than playing Hamza and Ndidi together and pushing youri forward again. Or he knew we'd lost the game and put him on just to give him a few minutes. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue-fox 397 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February Just now, Webbo said: Or he knew we'd lost the game and put him on just to give him a few minutes. If that’s the case, why didn’t he take off youri or ndidi to save them for Sunday? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SheppyFox 3,502 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February He looks nothing like Gray? 🧐 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Webbo 17,415 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February Just now, Blue-fox said: If that’s the case, why didn’t he take off youri or ndidi to save them for Sunday? Because he took Under off instead. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dannythefox 442 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February MOTM performance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FoxesWalk 368 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 1 minute ago, SheppyFox said: He looks nothing like Gray? 🧐 I did a double take when the cameras showed him getting ready to come on. Just his side profile I think. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
moore_94 5,107 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 4 minutes ago, Webbo said: Or he knew we'd lost the game and put him on just to give him a few minutes. He was getting ready to come on when it was still 1-0 tbf 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Webbo 17,415 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February Just now, moore_94 said: He was getting ready to come on when it was still 1-0 tbf So you think Brendan brought him on to save the game? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue-fox 397 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 3 minutes ago, Webbo said: Because he took Under off instead. Which is why i don’t think it was just to give him minutes Quote Link to post Share on other sites
moore_94 5,107 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 1 minute ago, Webbo said: So you think Brendan brought him on to save the game? Not single-handedly no, because that would just be ridiculous. But looking to bring him on at 1-0 with 10 minutes left suggests to me Brendan thought he could have some impact on the game. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stadt 13,289 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February I thought he looked fairly sharp in what was a horrible situation to make your debut in. With a serious lack of deep creative options aside from Tielemans he has an opportunity to get minutes now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SecretPro 3,359 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 5 minutes ago, dannythefox said: MOTM performance. MOTM could have easily gone to somebody not even in the stadium tonight 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Beachyboy 163 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February If Maddison can't play Sunday, Perez is injured, we need somebody to play as a 10, how anyone can judge on this 10 mins either way is beyond me though. What is the alternative, I guess is the more relevant question? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ric Flair 22,818 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February You lot make me laugh you really do, it's like you think I'm some sort of prat. I know more about football than you've had hot dinners, just be relieved we've got Maddison's replacement here. Look a gift horse in the mouth, give your heads a wobble!!! 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The boy Linacre 52 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February Not seen him before, little did like Thomas needs to get the game time but might be a player, ours always feel better Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lesterlad 397 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February I couldn’t see the point In brisnging him on Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Webbo 17,415 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 1 minute ago, Ric Flair said: You lot make me laugh you really do, it's like you think I'm some sort of prat. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LCFCbwoi 153 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 2 minutes ago, Beachyboy said: If Maddison can't play Sunday, Perez is injured, we need somebody to play as a 10, how anyone can judge on this 10 mins either way is beyond me though. What is the alternative, I guess is the more relevant question? Think Iheanacho will start in the 10, tbh; I think I’d like him at 9 as well Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Earle 1,229 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February 18 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: At the very least this shows he is very much in the thinking of the manager whilst we have serious selection problems, as I said would be the case to @Finnegan There's more than enough there with him, he's got a great future in the game and we have to get him to sign a new deal now. Start him on Sunday, Choudhiry was abysmal tonight and Tielemans needs to be back deeper. Wasn’t he? Again, as with Under, he might have made up a mind or two tonight Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Beachyboy 163 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February Just now, LCFCbwoi said: Think Iheanacho will start in the 10, tbh; I think I’d like him at 9 as well I think he should be in the team but don't think hes a 10, i'd rather we play with 2 out and out strikers than try to make him a 10. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LCFCbwoi 153 Posted 25 February Report Share Posted 25 February Just now, Beachyboy said: I think he should be in the team but don't think hes a 10, i'd rather we play with 2 out and out strikers than try to make him a 10. Hmm, I may agree with you. I guess we’ll see on Sunday I suppose Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.