Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
The Blur

Questions Thread

By The Blur, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

Carl the Llama

Carl the Llama

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Is Thracian banned after the controversial comment made in the Brighton thread? :unsure:

The thread complaining about it was closed with the line:

Quote

It was dealt with by the moderation team. I think 10 pages of calling him out and commenting on him when he can't respond is enough.

So that's a yes then.  Glad it's been dealt with and we can all move on, man definitely needed a bit of time in the sin bin

Edited by Carl the Llama
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steve_Walsh5

Steve_Walsh5

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Carl the Llama said:

The thread complaining about it was closed with the line:

So that's a yes then.  Glad it's been dealt with and we can all move on, man definitely needed a bit of time in the sin bin

I don't get why you were so desperate for him to be banned. If you don't like what he puts on here you could easily just put him on ignore. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl the Llama

Carl the Llama

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Steve_Walsh5 said:

I don't get why you were so desperate for him to be banned. If you don't like what he puts on here you could easily just put him on ignore. 

I'm not going to help you start this whole debate all over again, if you genuinely can't get your head around it then drop me a pm and I'll be happy to explain it to you. 

 

It's been dealt with so there's no point constantly dragging it up to start new arguments and derail perfectly good threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wymsey

Wymsey

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Carl the Llama said:

I'm not going to help you start this whole debate all over again, if you genuinely can't get your head around it then drop me a pm and I'll be happy to explain it to you. 

 

It's been dealt with so there's no point constantly dragging it up to start new arguments and derail perfectly good threads.

Don't want this thread to be about what happened to one member but I viewed his profile and on his bio information part, he's refusing to use the site again..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Facecloth

Facecloth

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Don't want this thread to be about what happened to one member but I viewed his profile and on his bio information part, he's refusing to use the site again..

Reading what he's put, it's nice to see the widespread criticism of what he said has made him rethink his stance :blink:

 

And he's clearly had issues with homosexuals in the past so now tars them all with the same brush, even to the point of where he's prepared to make up a connection to paedophilia. He can't see the error of his ways though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Great Boos Up

Great Boos Up

Posted
Posted

I noticed on the recent post match thread title it said "Leices" anyone else use this abbreviation?

And out of interest is there is pecking order about who starts the pre match, match and post match threads or is it just a keyboard competitive sprint/brawl ?

Everybody must read the very first post on the pre and post match threads.

If I ever do one it may be covertly sponsored ( I wonder what vagisil would pay me to sneak their name in );)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Webbo

Webbo

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Great Boos Up said:

I noticed on the recent post match thread title it said "Leices" anyone else use this abbreviation?

And out of interest is there is pecking order about who starts the pre match, match and post match threads or is it just a keyboard competitive sprint/brawl ?

Everybody must read the very first post on the pre and post match threads.

If I ever do one it may be covertly sponsored ( I wonder what vagisil would pay me to sneak their name in );)

That was me . :D

 

At the end of the Brighton game it was 5 minutes and nobody had started the thread so I thought I'd better do, by the time I'd posted it someone had beat me to it. This week nobody had done it so I rushed it so we wouldn't have 2 threads again.

 

There's no rule who can start it. If Steven isn't at the match it's usually him but it can be anyone, whoever's first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Strokes

Strokes

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Webbo said:

That was me . :D

 

At the end of the Brighton game it was 5 minutes and nobody had started the thread so I thought I'd better do, by the time I'd posted it someone had beat me to it. This week nobody had done it so I rushed it so we wouldn't have 2 threads again.

 

There's no rule who can start it. If Steven isn't at the match it's usually him but it can be anyone, whoever's first.

I'm going to start them all for the season now. That way I win and you all lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Floyd

The Floyd

Posted
Posted

I've been meaning to subscribe to the FT for a while now but I've noticed there's no cap on the amount of articles I can read without a subscription - when I think I'm right in saying there should actually be a cap after three. Has anyone else had this 'problem' or know if there's a reason for their generosity? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lovejoy

Lovejoy

Posted
Posted
On 8/24/2017 at 23:32, ajthefox said:

Who recruits recruitment consultants (staff) for recruitment consultants (companies)?

They are called rec2rec's and though the concept seems bizarre to the outsider, it's actually a very profitable industry. As many people will know, there are an awful lot of s**t recruiters out there so agencies and companies will pay good money for a good professional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nalis

Nalis

Posted
Posted

Having my stag in about a month, there are about 16 people going with 4 I'm not planning in inviting to the wedding. For one of the guys I'm not inviting, I went on his stag and got an evening invite to his wedding though it was a flight to Ireland so needless to say I didnt go. 

 

We're getting married in the North East and the four guys are from Ireland or London so sending a token evening invite would be bit insulting and obvious.

 

Wife to be its saying that those guys would expect to be invited to the wedding and the female consensus seems to agrees.

 

I know its my stag and I can do what I want but my question is....

 

If you've been invited to a mate's stag (a mate who isnt that close), would you automatically presume you were getting a wedding invite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Strokes

Strokes

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Nalis said:

 

If you've been invited to a mate's stag (a mate who isnt that close), would you automatically presume you were getting a wedding invite?

Me personally no, I'd prefer it that way. It's having your cake and eating it. Explaining it too the wife would be trickiest bit, why I am spending money going on a mates stag, that doesn't even invite me to the wedding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nalis

Nalis

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, SystonFox said:

Yes I would. If they're good enough mates to be on the stag why aren't they good enough to go to the wedding? In my opinion of course but that's the way I'd see it. 

 

Bin them from the stag do it's easier!

 

I see what you are saying and thanks for the feedback. My logic is that we are limited on numbers for the wedding (having a medium sized wedding).

 

3 minutes ago, Strokes said:

Me personally no, I'd prefer it that way. It's having your cake and eating it. Explaining it too the wife would be trickiest bit, why I am spending money going on a mates stag, that doesn't even invite me to the wedding.

Yeah, in addition to the stag in my mentioned original post I've been on a another stag (old friend rather than close friend) where I got a late invite but couldnt go and was never bothered about it. Think for guys a lot of it is about the stag do itself whereas for women it would be a complete no-no.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...