Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
jonthefox

The "do they mean us?" thread

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Max Wall said:

My 5 favourite posts on fighting cocks. All from the same poster. 1. Pre-match 2,3 & During match 5. Post match.

 

1. Leicester denied us our only real recent chance at the league for WHATEVER reason they managed it... and I still can't work out how, why or who they managed to rope into that little Far Eastern Syndicate scam...
But I don't forget, and I occasionally forgive... but the shit they've been since they won the thing suggests summit weren't right... and if THATS the case, then we have more than plenty of reasons to want to beat them...
Into submission would be nice!
Just fcuking Win Spurs... remember what happened and royally take it out on these little shits!

 

 

2. RIGHT.... FcuK OFFF!!!!!! Fcuk off Leicester and your rat-faced Steptoe cnut faced talisman...
what the **** have we done wrong since finishing second in the league...?
who the fcuk have we offended?

 

3. We'll win this 3-2... eat THAT you melts!

 

4. eah... no fcuking penalty... if he'd been wearing red with a fcuking GUN on his chest (and Wenger hovering over the ref's child with his cock halfway up his arse) it may have been given...
we're ****ed because we have't bought our way to the title with corrupt oil money, or some weird illuminati Child porn ring that guarantees a result... 
we may as well give up now... 'cos we're playing it straight and trying to give English Youth a chance...

let's just buy up all the foreign talent and purchase our next trophy.
fcuking 'British' football has totally gone to shit.

it can g fcuk itself for all I care...

 

5.  Bollocks to this cnut mess... whatever's caused it... whether it's of our own making, or from outside sources, fcuk it/them all... 

seriously. FCUK THEM ALL!
Goodnight.. I'm outta here...
Mic drop

 

 

lollol

I'm so glad I din't read that in bed :crylaugh:Priceless stuff. You can always bet on the melting cocks to deliver the joy when they choke

 

So... If mighty Spuds have beaten Real Madrid and we beat Spuds... this means the world is our ostrich amirite :punk:

Edited by Chester Dontlie
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Max Wall said:

we're ****ed because we have't bought our way to the title with corrupt oil money, or some weird illuminati Child porn ring that guarantees a result... 

lollol

Who bought the title with an illuminati child porn ring? ****ing Alex Jones has had more sane rants than that 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 28/11/2017 at 05:01, easilee said:

This was my favourite quote from the Whining cock forum......

 

'Feel free to dine out on that title win, boys. All the way to relegation - because that is what complacency and relying on former glory gets you.'

 

How the fvck would they know lol?!

 

 

In fairness relying on former glory is something they specialise in and epitomise even though most of them weren't alive the last time they had any "glory" 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 6-1 was effectively a dead rubber when the pressure was off. In the October of last season we drew 1-1 at their place. We also took 4 points off them in the title-winning season.

 

They can take their meaningless 6-1 because it did actually mean exactly naff all.

Edited by ALC Fox
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox92 said:

Spoke to some Spurs fans in chip shop last night prior to the ground. They were sound tbf we had a good conversation.

 

The Spurs fans at my work are all decent lads and I'd count them as friends. They also all took it squarely on the chin last night as I did rather 'hand it out' mainly because going two clear was so unexpected. No bitching and moaning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, surrifox said:

In fairness relying on former glory is something they specialise in and epitomise even though most of them weren't alive the last time they had any "glory" 

Their motto is 'the game is about glory', isn't it? Must be soul destroying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He booked nine Spurs players in the bad-tempered match, but now says he could have sent off three players."

 

It would have been a great show if Spurs were left with 8 players in that game... just imagine it, remember that meltdown at The Fighting Cock - it would have been 10 times better!

Edited by RussianFox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ealingfox said:

I mean it is a little troubling to read that. You should be refereeing on the basis of an agreed interpretation of the laws of the game, not on the basis of how it will make you look afterwards or in any way specific to the context of one game. If players commit red card offences they should be sent off and that's that.

Pretty much nailed it. What if tottenham some how scored and won that would have backfired.

 

Bad call ref bad call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think a ref should be pubically stating he had a "plan". Spurs totally lost their heads in that game and could easlily have had multiple red cards. I don't think anyone would have "blamed" Clattenburg. He seems a little too full of his own self importance.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of mentions from the Fighting Cock surrounding the Clattenburg interview:

 

"Refs are bought and its naive to think otherwise , I can't tell you which ones and differentiate between human error and corrupt decisions but it's happening , it's no coincidence that when all the usual beneficiaries of such decisions were out of the race a couple of years ago Leicester were given so so many decisions."

 

"I’ve noticed Kante can make a good 3/4 fouls before the referee even considers booking him. Although that was the same at Leicester"

 

Not that they're carrying a grudge, or anything.

Edited by Ted Maul
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ted Maul said:

A couple of mentions from the Fighting Cock surrounding the Clattenburg interview:

 

"Refs are bought and its naive to think otherwise , I can't tell you which ones and differentiate between human error and corrupt decisions but it's happening , it's no coincidence that when all the usual beneficiaries of such decisions were out of the race a couple of years ago Leicester were given so so many decisions."

 

"I’ve noticed Kante can make a good 3/4 fouls before the referee even considers booking him. Although that was the same at Leicester"

 

Not that they're carrying a grudge, or anything.

But the point is, in that particular match, Clattenburg has said he gave the decisions to spurs by not sending their players off. It's like moaning for not showing the red card to your own player.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...