Knighton1976

3 minutes ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

If they didn't bounce up and down would that have stopped Rudkin spunking £200m?

No

1 minute ago, Lako42 said:

Some people had a conversation

 

Nobody is allowed to know what they said

 

The end 

You still here quote after quote about having enough and moving on...please do.

1 minute ago, Skidmark said:

It's got the wrong people in it. Difficult to get those out as they've had their feet under the rug for so long.

 

I've said for years we should on here be without doubt forming a fan group. We are the largest community of Leicester fans.

 

I'd be more than happy to look at establishing it.

Go on then. Won't happen in a million years. Oh, incidentally, as people have told you on here over and over again you can't sue the owners of the club for banning people.

Buts let always remember if you wear black and bounce up and down well, wow, just wow, I wish....

Dudes, yes indeed Dr.

1 minute ago, Clogger_ said:

Of everything I read about, this topic makes me the most angry. Pathetic attempts to control and sanitise the sport we all love. Imagine wanting more happy-clapping, seat blocking Ginetta/FT types, and fewer passionate singing fans creating a slightly 'edgy' atmosphere. WTAF. Purge the lot of them.

 

KP OUT, and take your happy clappers with you. Let them watch Polo

Bed wetter.

19 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

KPFC putting out desperate statements this evening. I think they're properly worried about the protest.

They're really not 

22 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said:

those guys not bring at the ground or silent................people will notice

Sorry?

8 minutes ago, The Doctor said:

which UFS member shat in your Weetabix this morning?

Not a big list, easy to narrow it down.

8 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Oooo a thinly veiled dig at UFS! Edgy! 

Wasn't thinly veiled.

Just now, Paninistickers said:

200 more than Foxes Trust have ever cobbled together..

70 I think which gives them a big voice, massive, well when they're not on a singing strike...

1 minute ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

 

 

 

1. It's not my protest. 2. I'm not even going, I'll be at work. 3. Cretin.

 

Oh no, we might end up being treated like actual fans rather than cash cows who have the piss taken out of us every week! Please no!

You're not even going...well you'll be in the majority at least 

Just now, Dr The Singh said:

50

I was trying to encourage the echo chamber, come on....

3 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

Today. Publicity..

Tomorrow. We'll see. But potentially a march of 500-5000 people 

Maybe, 200 max would be my view.

1 minute ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

It's a forum you cretin, don't read it if you don't want opinions.

Honestly, you are calling me a cretin..

Anyway you just had my mine. Here's another you sad deluded moon**** no-one cares about your protest, it'll fall flat on its arse.

1 minute ago, Silva Fox said:

KPFC zombie alert!

Or serfs or bodies or any other insult employed on here by the three dozen echo chamberers going round on planet foxestalk.co.uk. I detest the ownership but, honestly, this is even more laughable...

2 minutes ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

I'm willing to give anyone a try, there 4/10 owners at best in the past few years, roll the dice, we might get a 6 or a 7...

Are you the decision maker here then? How many shares do you actually have to sell to those you are willing "to give a try to?"

11 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

Absolute shambles..I stick up for you lot on here as I'd guess you're all well meaning proper passionate City fans.... but you are so wound up in committees, sub committees,.minute taking, association rules and banging a chairman's hammer - 'all those in favour say aye!'

 

one lone punter on here has achieved more in three weeks than you lot have in 20+ years. 

What's he achieved though actually?

5 minutes ago, Clogger_ said:

Believe I just read you decrying "virtue signalling" on another thread...

Good pick up to be fair, forensic.

3 minutes ago, Lako42 said:

It was the absolute pits today. 

 

 

We are now below the likes of Brighton as a supporter base 

 

 

Lost me £20 there fella, I was expecting you're cheerful, uplifting views at least three hours earlier.

2 minutes ago, adam said:

You can't really care too much about the result if you're clearing off home with over 10 minutes left.

I didn't, I stayed until the last kick as I have done since the 1970's. I'm just bored by the endless virtue signalling, arse wringing from those who want to comment on others. Honestly why would you give one unless you were looking for 'likes'?

14 minutes ago, adam said:

They won't care. They probably don't even check the result.  I'm convinced the vast majority don't give a toss.

Utter nonsense, but let's go around again and see if we can build this up to 300 pages of thread....

2 hours ago, Silebyfox_89 said:

For the 60 minutes it was flatter than Kiera Knightleys cleavage.

Greg Wallace is in the house....

21 hours ago, Foxes_Trust said:

The members we have met previously in regards to the above, also made the following requests on August 19th

 

3) The chance to re-consider our involvement with the Trust’s working groups

 

We responded positively with ... Yes, having completed the Skills Assessment, we are happy for the two of you to take up the offer of Board Subgroup roles as previously made. With the main initial survey now completed and results about to be released, and the Fan Engagement Framework/Fans Advisory Board plans now launched, our priority would be to add one of you to the Comms Subgroup where there is plenty to do and is by far the most active subgroup week by week.

If you do agree to join the Board Subgroups, we would also encourage you to attend the FSA training sessions ahead of the elections

 

So far this re-confirmed offer has not been taken up, which still baffles the Trust board and all the new Board Subgroup members who took up the offer originally in May, all of whom have contributed positively to the Trust since that time. with many of them undergoing the FSA Training.

 

4) How the Trust can operate in a more agile manner

 

We have asked initially for some more details via e-mail and we can then determine the most appropriate people from the main board/sub-groups to then meet and discuss further, but so far there has been a refusal to provide any written details, which we feel is a perfectly reasonable request, rather than involving board members who aren't involved in the relevant processes.

Crikey, sounds like an organisation complex enough to run a medium size country. One question, if the Comms 'sub group' is busy on a weekly basis......where are the comms?

1 hour ago, Tommy G said:

No it wouldn’t implicate because anyone worth their salt would replace them before it did (I know that’s the theme of the last 160 odd pages and I’m in agreement) secondly operating a factory is a bit different, an Ops director isn’t responsible or sanctioning big spend without it being signed off by someone else.

And those involved might have moved on by now....or died of boredom.