Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

tcrofts

Member
  • Posts

    284
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tcrofts

  1. 3 minutes ago, OnlyOneCity said:

    There are an awful lot of stories on the Merc website regarding Russell Martin being the new manager and various players being sold. I do not subscribe to the paper so am unable to find anything which is subscription only. None of these stories have been raised on FT so maybe no one else subscribes or they are not true. If not true, why do they print this stuff. Surely your local paper should be keeping you in the loop of what is actually happening.

    Unfortunately it's owned by the Mirror now, most local rags are

     

    All the headlines for the articles this new chap has written are all click bait nonsense.

  2. 7 hours ago, FLAN said:

    Thanks for responding. 
    Based on how we see the club being run I doubt anyone in the room with you feels confident enough to take that info to Rudkin, Top or anyone else “in power” without fear of repercussions for themselves. 
    If the media put more pressure on it might help but the local media are too concerned with maintaining access to hold them accountable. 
     

    Radio Leicester had members of the Trust on last week, taking about the survey and the calls to action.

  3. 1 hour ago, Foxes_Trust said:

    We handed out 15,000 leaflets at four matches (Hull home, Millwall home, Portsmouth away and Blackburn away).

    With a sample size of 4,000 and a range of distribution methods online and in-person, we can be pretty confident that these results represent a cross section of the fan base and enough quantity of responses to be more than statistically valid.

    I know. My post is backing you. I clearly stated that it was a good volume and a good conversion rate. At no point did I say its not a good sample size 

     

    I was trying to point out to the poster that it'd be difficult to reach everyone for a number of reasons

  4. 55 minutes ago, Oldblueyes said:

    4,413 participants in the review, does that mean the other 28,000 of the so called happy clappers, are just fine as things stand?

    Don't get me wrong, I'm all for the survey, I filled it out myself and hope that it gets some traction with the club

     

    However, there will be a large majority that dont know the survey exists for various reasons ie. too young to have emails, not Internet Savvy, not on forums or social media etc

     

    Based on comments seen on social media some wont do it as they dont think it will achieve anything, some wont do it because they dont agree with it

     

    I think 4k is a really high uptake for a survey. Even out of 30k+ it's a really

    good conversion and a better response rate (from what I've read before) than any the club has had on their own surveys

  5. 2 hours ago, adam said:

    Why did we get rid of the ticket office at the ground? Phone lines clearly are not working. 

    Tried to relocate earlier and couldn't get through, seats we wanted were then gone. Don't understand why its 2026 and you cant do it online

    • Like 1
  6. 2 hours ago, Aus Fox said:

    Don’t worry, have a half arsed performance pass the ball side ways and backwards a few times and you might leave the KP with a 3 year contract on £50,000 a week.

    Was just about to post the same and saw your comment 🤣

     

    We could all chip in for the cost then split the weekly wages when whoever is the least prolific in front of goal gets signed up. 

  7. 15 hours ago, moore_94 said:

    The one massive positive from relegation and if we go out of business is that I wont have to see anymore shite from the second tier podcast pillocks about us anymore

    Too right. Bar BSLB the rest can do one, especially Leicester til I die lol

  8. 34 minutes ago, AyewJoking said:

    Let Daka be in charge of making his own toast, the fool will obviously burn the place down and we can claim on the insurance.

     

     

    you did insure it.... right Top??

    You're expecting that he can stand in front of a toaster with a piece of bread and place it in the toaster. Chances are he'd miss

    • Haha 1
  9. 2 hours ago, nnfox said:

    So if we win we finish 6 points behind Blackburn, with a better goal difference.  That adds legitimacy to the claim that we were relegated because of off field issues, and could/would be used to somewhat paper over the cracks.

     

    I don't want us humiliated or anything like that, but if there was ever a game I didn't want us to win, it's this one.

    I hope they wouldn't use it to paper over the cracks because what they have (not) done over they years has put us in a position where 6 points deducted can put us in relegation 

  10. (Yes I was there. For my own reasons) but I can't comprehend some of our fans, acting like we havent been relegated. Some nob behind me shouting for us to run it in to the corner in injury time like the result matters Makes a big difference when UFS other sections aren't there

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...