Jump to content


  • Post count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by AlloverthefloorYesNdidi

  1. All maybe true, but my example of the kids getting a day off school you didnt address - nobody gets a day off for saying climate change isnt real I dont know exactly how the scientific community's funding is meted out but i'm sure I read that to say a project is related to climate change gets you funding quite well For the particular discussion here I suppose stats about funding for scientists for each different perspective on climate change would be useful
  2. I dont know about this topic as a whole, but I have to say this statement is in a bit of a denial of the hysteria of the things atm- Lots of people are making whole careers based on the idea that things 'arent hunky dory': that there is a toxic patriarchy, that society is oppressing trans people. that gender is in fact a confusing multicoloured rainbow of tangled oppression and socially constructed evils, or whatever it is they're saying today. And similarly, children now get to ditch school, parrot the climate change line in the streets and then become lauded as heroes To say there is no personal benefit for indivuduals espousing this is not quite right Having said that, I have no idea on the actual science of climate change. Most talk about it seems a lot of useless posturing though which of course should make anyone wary of the subject.
  3. I kind of see what you're saying But if you think you'd be on this train of thought if Leicester had just done what Liverpool have just done......
  4. Every true football fan worldwide is buzzing about this
  5. Compare Gray's and Barnes' play in that build up Weirdos will still slag Gray off for some reason
  6. Is this one of the court rulings you believe then?
  7. Could also equally say its naive to think your will to see him as guilty isnt based on your issue with him as a person.
  8. Is there any court decision anywhere in the world ever that you will accept?
  9. Started a whole thread about this which got deleted. Basically, I watched the documentary, found it compelling, then looked up the facts of the matter online and its on record, court documents, the lot, its (the documentary, and all other historical allegations) mostly demonstrably bollocks. (FBI investigated him for 10 years. They found nothing. They have about an 85% conviction rate or something. That alone should be enough to make you curious about the other side of the story) No point in having a discussion on here, if you're really interested, please do look up the other side of the story. Start with a youtube guy called razorfist, michael jackson rebuttal videos Its fine if you think otherwise. Thats just my opinion Forgive me for being brisk, was basically called a paedo by one guy on here for just suggesting MJ appears innocent based on the information that is easily found online if one wants to look for it
  10. So want to open a Michael Jackson is innocent thread, but feel like it would get closed All the info is on the net anyway. The guy didnt do it (Not a joke)
  11. The only thing thats guaranteed is virtue signalling
  12. To be fair, the few comments he's made on Islam do seem to say there is a fundamental difference between it and Christianity in that Mohammed (sp?) was a warlord. He did say he doesnt know enough about it, but the implication of that suggests a suspicion of Islam itself and thats a pretty incediary comment and I think one would be justified and wanting him to expand on that as best he can because it corresponds with the war of civilisations view Its the one area ive seen him dabble in that i wonder what the extent of his thought is there, because if you believe Christianity and Islam are essentially adversaries then thats a pretty poor outlook for the world. I dont believe thats the essential issue at hand, but there are some that do and its a conversation worth having to cut through the bs. Difficult conversation maybe. Not helped by idiotic t shirts of course
  13. I think ive answered it really by saying that as he's come up against leftist ideologues, to use his term, he's consequently been in a state of opposition to a group of people on the left, so incidentally people on the right using a very low level of analysis could use his image and co-opt it with their views, thinking that as he's not on that left team he might be on their right wing team I think its exactly that and nothing more. As the man himself says people extreme right wingers detest him as much as the extreme left wingers do
  14. If you listen to the content of what he says it doesnt lean to the right. In fact if you listen to or read him extensively it starts to boggle the mind that there is such kick-back against him when he is so well intentioned. I think its more indicative of how polarising debate is currently that he's construed on the right of the political spectrum Maybe in opposing certain insane leftist ideology some right leaning people are drawn to that, more incidental if anything; even if there is a substantial right wing group of individuals clinging to what he's doing which I think its negligible
  15. Footage the director is saving for Leaving Neverland 2
  16. Not confirmed. I'm still holding out for him and sitting on the fence. Please dont be a nonce Michael
  17. Sorry, totally derailed the gravity of this thread with this tripe havent I?
  18. Ronaldinho is going to marry two women at the same time What A Baller
  19. I'll accept his foibles because he has much to be said for him and will only improve But take him off corners cos they're always s***
  20. it did feel a bit wrong and shameful. Was being slightly tongue in cheek so i left it there I apologise to all relevant posters Sorry again
  21. Mods? Ive been suspended for less retarded stuff than this (note i said less, conceding that ive made retarded posts)
  22. I dont mean to say that the manager has made no difference. Its too early to tell anything about Rodgers (if i was to be critical you could say when he tried a new formation it bombed) The signs of improved play came with Tielemans Today is no different really to how our season has gone. Giving a goal (red card in this case) away early on with a silly mistake. We played well today and Rodgers handled it very well and got the subs spot on But it could have gone another way. Ndidi very lucky not to give away a pen As you say maybe Rodgers has made a big difference tactically, i'm not sure there is massive evidence for that. I dont see enough to say "wow, Puel really was shit, Rodgers has come in and got us ticking", just doesnt look like it to me, but each his own Again, the players have been at fault for many results this season and i dont know why i need to go back and acknowledge anything else about that We were down to 10 in 5 minutes. We were lucky not to concede a pen (definite contact from Ndidi). Things went our way today, but it could easily have been the sort of result Puel got hammered for. Its not often Madderz bangs in such a wonderful free kick or we get a lucky deflection on a cross that Wes can get on the end of I dont want to be taking away from the performance which was good in many ways. And im supportive of Rodgers Im.not seeing this "see, Puel was shit after all" though. We needed Tielemans and if we had him in August i really think the season might have gone a lot differently for us and Puel Sorry if you dont like that opinion
  • Create New...