Silebyfox_89

4 hours ago, Wsl said:

Oh it looks like we're going for the short stuff again. What happened to just bowling a tight line and frustrating the bat? Doesn't do much for the over rate either, which is really bad right now.

Very one dimensional tactic by Baz, leaked about 100 runs more than nessarcy. 

It looks like we abandoned bowler plans and just stuck to one type of plan. Poor.

Interesting we've cut the pitch like this, got approval from the ECB to do it.

Whatever to make of it we've started well and got to keep the pressure on them. We can't let them I.e. Bairstow score big now and get to 300+ otherwise unlikely to win IMO.

2 hours ago, RowlattsFox said:

A lot to like about Gay but think he needs to find a couple more scoring shots. Doesn't give it away though and has shown good temperament. 

James Rew has looked good but should be out.

 

Agreed. On the highlights it looks like a hybrid version of Cook and Sibley.

I like his application but does need a few more scoring options to go to the next level.

41 minutes ago, MC Prussian said:

Oh, the shirt…

 

Stunning architecture 

11 hours ago, Stadt said:

I don’t think you fall under the gambling commission’s remit  

True. But just reiterating to have fun and be responsible too 😊

A thread for those who are placing bets on the matches during the world cup.

Share your tips, bets and recommendations.

I've done pretty well so far on BTTS and choosing a winner in other games. Getting odds of 2/3-1 and all 4 have come in so far.

Please note to gamble responsibly and only bet on what you can afford to lose.

19 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

Very changed England XI then. 

Indeed looking forward to seeing how Cox and Rew do against international quality bowling. Will be a good test for them in their development.

I like Baker's moxy and pace but got a feeling its still too early for him and he's going to get slapped around the park.

15 minutes ago, StanSP said:

What score we looking for here? 

 

175? 200?

400

1 hour ago, Ryy said:

For league one and championship he’s a good appointment

25 minutes ago, jv1 said:

Yep I’m having that - iv never seen hatred like it for a bloke that hasn’t even been appointed and I’m still not sure after reading a lot of posts what exactly he’s done wrong to us 

 

I think unfortunately he is the scapegoat for all the frustration of the last few years 

 

I personally hope he does well

His record in league one would suggest otherwise, only 1 decent season in the championship with relegated prem side.

Rangers stint showed how much of a shitshow were in for.

He can't setup a defensive unit which has been our achillies heel for 4 years now.

I always want our managers to do well but his record and data would suggest otherwise.

Glad I didn't renew my season ticket and have to watch sideways and backwards.

Challinor was the obvious choice but our ownership were too blinded to see it.

9 hours ago, westernpark said:

What a nonsense comment. 

My apologies, auto correct my text. 

Comment updated.

Listened to him on the radio leicester WYS podcast and he sounds a bit dry.

He got various things wrong and then created false situations to create opinions on the club and Russell. Strange.

Shame Jordan has gone no need to read Joshs click bait articles.

Only 1 over from Alex Green, is he injured?

2 hours ago, Walshy5 said:

A player that can't get a game for a division 2 side is now good enough for us then.

A bit harsh me thinks, Evison isn't a bad player at all. Tidy player with a knack for building partnerships. 

46 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

Hearing from where?!

45 minutes ago, AjcW said:

The voices in their head.

39 minutes ago, Happy Fox said:

Burnley would not go for Russell Martin, Scott Parker to Martin would be a huge downgrade.

33 minutes ago, JonnyBoy said:

This is foxestalk ,where people try and get attention from pretending they have a club source and won't name where it came from. They know f*ck all 

A few people have mentioned it on social media and a few websites in the last few hours.

Don't pretend to be in the know just relaying what I've read and heard.

A think a few people need to chill I'm just passing info on not ITK at all.

Could be wrong but hearing he prefers Burnley job now than Leicester, looks like we're moving on with other candidates.

17 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

LEE SATCHEL YOUR BAAAARSTAARD

French bagman 

21 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

Some reports online suggest it’s almost done and could be announced as early as tomorrow. No idea how reliable. 

Saw leicester fan TV using AI to make an look like we've moved the deal, Phil isn't a reliable source.

12 minutes ago, Sankey93 said:

It’s going to be Martin! 

Source?

Latest reports suggest we've not advanced any further with Martin and Gill is staying at WBA. Looks like we're looking Hake and others as of now.

1 minute ago, MPH said:

 

just for clarification, I was saying he has an offer from us, and his agent has released this info about other offers so he can get better terms from us.

I hope he turns us down

Would love to know what other "offers" Martin has had since his Rangers stint?

He'd be better off going Saudi and away from the UK for his own reputation.

37 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

I really hope Challinor is under consideration however I have a feeling he goes to Salford, just something I had heard. 

It would be a sideways move at best, with his record he deserves a step up at a bigger club. He did mention in his interview that he's ambitious so that rule Salford out imo.

Even the Lord Jebus would struggle to get us promoted 

Fact of the matter is if we offer Challinor the same "lucrative" offer (whatever the value is) that we've made to Brussell he would be here by now.

10 hours ago, Ted Maul said:

If it's Martin, that will just completely wipe out the little energy I've got left for the club at the moment. 

Agreed.

If they do appoint him then I'm glad I gave up my season ticket.

Rivals on Disney is good