Maybe I’m being pessimistic, but the way I see it is that a transfer embargo plus points deduction is double jeopardy. The points deduction on top of a transfer embargo almost ensures that you run the very real risk of being relegated to a lower league which entails lower revenue from league position, lower revenue from gate receipts, less or no TV revenue and the loss of revenue from sales of players as the vultures swoop to cherry pick from what was a half decent team. These are seemingly draconian measures which could lead, in the worst case scenario to exactly what the FFP rules were instigated to try to prevent. A successful business plan surely works on investment to increase future profit or streamlining by keeping the most efficient, strongest part of the business to build on going forward. Application of both the punishments appears to be a “ hamstringing” process to push a club into years of rebuilding on a very low budget. How on earth would any club outside the top, highest earning clubs in the premier league think that it was a good idea to vote for this kind of ruling? Am I wrong?