123

For the purpose of healthy discussion rather than my own opinion, is a half way house option worth considering? Perhaps "LCFC NOT KPFC - SINCE 1884" Something that clearly denotes displeasure with the regime but also has a positive tone yet reminds the club that we existed long before Susan and co. Either way personally I am very supportive of any action that highlights the gap between "them and us".

It appears this chat forum replaces swear words with asterisks. See above. I'm sure the point is received.

I have donated. Thank you and well done for organising. If I could choose any wording it would be "**** DIGITAL TICKETS" because I am so mad about the issue, but will of course accept the majority view.

Hello Internet. I have been a season ticket holder since 1989. I will not be going next season. I will either renew and "empty chair" until such time the "club" behaves like an actual club or just cancel outright. I don't need to repeat all the failings of the current regime, they are obvious, but the mandatory digital footprint is the final straw. For those of you arguing that this is just "progress" or "normal these days", I feel sad for the digital, compliant populace future, being embraced by, dare I say it, a grossly mistaken view or ignorance of how the rights of the individual were hard won. Dramatic I know, but look at the bigger picture beyond LCFC. Having read the minutes of the "fan consultations" published as somehow permission for the actions of the club, I am appalled. Especially the 'just do it" line regarding the implementation of mandatory digital footprint. These people, apart from UFS, do not represent me, or the views of any of the 20 or so people I attend games with. Proof that the world is ran by people with the spare time to attend the most meetings. Perhaps they have spare time because their input is not a valued commodity elsewhere. The "club" needs to regain it's identity. Support non-league in the meantime.