Hullfox Posted 25 March 2005 Posted 25 March 2005 Issues like the groundshare being so highly objected to by the majority of supporters are a smokescreen also by the critical and more vociferous members of internet forums who use well thought out descriptions as their one worders, particularly with regard to The Trust and Paul Mace. Exactly how many people actually took part in a sit in, sang their disapproval and attended the question and answer evening? Very few that's how many. 82316[/snapback] I stayed behind, voiced my disapproval, and went to the Q & A session. 82657[/snapback] Ditto. 82691[/snapback] That'll be two then will it? 82709[/snapback] But it's the two biggest and bestest fans around, so we count as 43,728 people. 82827[/snapback] I attended the sit in. However, due to work, I wasn't able to attend the meeting. <_< 82838[/snapback] So, that'll be three then will it?
Cobbo Posted 25 March 2005 Posted 25 March 2005 Issues like the groundshare being so highly objected to by the majority of supporters are a smokescreen also by the critical and more vociferous members of internet forums who use well thought out descriptions as their one worders, particularly with regard to The Trust and Paul Mace. Exactly how many people actually took part in a sit in, sang their disapproval and attended the question and answer evening? Very few that's how many. 82316[/snapback] I stayed behind, voiced my disapproval, and went to the Q & A session. 82657[/snapback] Ditto. 82691[/snapback] That'll be two then will it? 82709[/snapback] But it's the two biggest and bestest fans around, so we count as 43,728 people. 82827[/snapback] I attended the sit in. However, due to work, I wasn't able to attend the meeting. <_< 82838[/snapback] So, that'll be three then will it? 82862[/snapback] so we count as 43,728 people
Scow Posted 25 March 2005 Posted 25 March 2005 Issues like the groundshare being so highly objected to by the majority of supporters are a smokescreen also by the critical and more vociferous members of internet forums who use well thought out descriptions as their one worders, particularly with regard to The Trust and Paul Mace. Exactly how many people actually took part in a sit in, sang their disapproval and attended the question and answer evening? Very few that's how many. 82316[/snapback] I stayed behind, voiced my disapproval, and went to the Q & A session. 82657[/snapback] Ditto. 82691[/snapback] That'll be two then will it? 82709[/snapback] But it's the two biggest and bestest fans around, so we count as 43,728 people. 82827[/snapback] I attended the sit in. However, due to work, I wasn't able to attend the meeting. <_< 82838[/snapback] So, that'll be three then will it? 82862[/snapback] so we count as 43,728 people 82866[/snapback] What Sam said.
Guest Posted 25 March 2005 Posted 25 March 2005 Issues like the groundshare being so highly objected to by the majority of supporters are a smokescreen also by the critical and more vociferous members of internet forums who use well thought out descriptions as their one worders, particularly with regard to The Trust and Paul Mace. Exactly how many people actually took part in a sit in, sang their disapproval and attended the question and answer evening? Very few that's how many. 82316[/snapback] I stayed behind, voiced my disapproval, and went to the Q & A session. 82657[/snapback] Ditto. 82691[/snapback] That'll be two then will it? 82709[/snapback] But it's the two biggest and bestest fans around, so we count as 43,728 people. 82827[/snapback] I attended the sit in. However, due to work, I wasn't able to attend the meeting. <_< 82838[/snapback] So, that'll be three then will it? 82862[/snapback] so we count as 43,728 people 82866[/snapback] What Sam said. 82868[/snapback] Well done us three!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.