Guest freund Posted 22 April 2005 Posted 22 April 2005 Yes there is: suffer fools like you gladly. 96689[/snapback] So why bother? 97016[/snapback] have you had your sense of humour surgically removed?
Guest Posted 22 April 2005 Posted 22 April 2005 Yes there is: suffer fools like you gladly. 96689[/snapback] So why bother? 97016[/snapback] have you had your sense of humour surgically removed? 97017[/snapback] No, have you?
Simon Posted 22 April 2005 Posted 22 April 2005 The moment that some of you have been waiting for. A few guilty consciences I notice. 'It was me! It was me!' confesses Lisa. Well, she might have said it...but I haven't checked her out.Well the idiot who certainly posted all that guff about Micky Adams and Mr Gemmill (could you believe it!) was none other than that twisted Jock, BARTON FOX That explains why he's half way up Levein's backside now. It explains why he was up Gemmills 'international class' backside then. It further explains why he's made himself scarce on these boards since lunchtime yesterday. Do you understand now why I say so many rude things about my fellow chilly Jockolanders? Too casual for words indeed! And now for the final insult....Do you know who the inspiration was for all his casual Jockishness is? The role models for his Aberdonian Hooligans? THE BAY CITY ROLLERS! Shang-A-Lang Folks! 95945[/snapback] What exactly have you outed Micky? I stand by everything I said, I never shouted for his head while he was in charge as I hoped he'd work it out. But you were too stubborn or weak or thick to do it. When you were presented with 2 chances to build your team you cocked it up, once okay you're young, twice you're a fool. La Manga was an abomination and he should have gone then and there. Why he never got rid of Bassett is a mystery and his promotion achievement is now being seen for what it was, great for the Club but achieved by a bunch of players desperate for their salaries and fat bonus. I reckon Bernie could have got that lot promoted. As for Gemmill I'd rather him than Nalis but then that is subjective and the role he now plays behind the scene with the reserves is probably invaluable. What makes me laugh about you is your unwillingness to accept the deep rooted problems at the Club and acknowledge the fact Levein has identified them and has a blueprint to attempt to rectify them. Something you (MA) was incapable of. But you seem to be an advocate of the quick-fix and the aging has-been or never-quite-was. That adhoc policy has left the Club in dire straits and while it isn't all Adams fault he could have changed it. Quite what you would like Levein to do would interest me. 'Too casual for words' - a response to a highly charged thread regarding hoolie wannabes and L1'ers, it's a tounge in cheek phrase and if you want to claim I took inspiration from the ASC then you can. All it does is confirm that you live in your own little dream world. I am flattered you took an interest in my posts, although a little disturbed. By the way Micky, you are very overrated and obviously have an inflated opinion of yourself. Why did F*rest turn you down and plumbed for Megson? 96255[/snapback] There's more brass in that neck of your's than I thought Barton. So I won't waste too much time on you. There's no doubt that I have made you look a complete fool. Correction, you have made yourself look a complete fool on this forum and it's taken 36 hours for you to regain your composure. You continue to bang on about La Manga only because you have no skeletons in your posting archive for me to dig out on that subject. So you are safe on that score. As for the Trees, they made their bed and they've got at least a season to lie in it. It's called Division One. Shang-A-Lang loser! 96259[/snapback] <_< You have an very good knack of avoiding questions put to you, which clearly shows you to be a fool. You actually have yet to say anything that leads me to belive you know the first thing about football or indeed Leicester City. As for 36 hours to respond, I apologize for not being on here 24/7, but I do have a life to lead, something you seem to be devoid of. La Manga - got you there ain't I. You really don't need to have the light on when you go to bed, the monsters don't exist. 96261[/snapback] Exactly Barton, He has conveniently left unanswered questions that I have put to him. Yet he expects you to answer all of his and as well as that he expects you to give you the answer that HE wants. As for you taking 36 hours respond, thats typical Chandler; he who takes an age to respond with 10 lines of waffly bulls***. Chander spent 40 minutes not only looking at but replying to one of my posts; and yet he only managed 10 lines! As for being literal minded Channy me old muck stain I am anything but- your 'metaphors' just dont make any sense 96386[/snapback] You have a very high opinion of yourself young man if you think ANYONE would spend 40 minutes deciphering your irrational thoughts (couched in truly dreadful prose) let alone someone who actually writes for a living. I don't bother to reply to you anymore because you either can't internalise what I post (my most basic arguments seem to fly over your Neanderthal skull) or your skunk/lager addled neurons simply dump any memory of my answers. When you can demonstrate you can express a simple, original idea coherently, rather than just repeat paradoxical, moronic, mob sentiments then I might start taking you more seriously. But at the moment the word 'measured' to you is just a descrption of your piss chapped inside leg... 96645[/snapback] How long did it take you to write that one? Whether or not I have a high opinion of myself (which in any case could certainly not be higher then the opinion you have of yourself) you spent 40 minutes replying to one of my so called 'irrational thoughts'. If they were so irrational why'd it take so long? As for skunk and lager, never touched pot in my life and very rarely drink anymore. You see your problem Mr Bing is that you cant reply to people stating facts so you have to make up stuff to justify your 'arguments'. As for me not getting your arguments, there's only one awfully repetitious argument to get! And by the way the Neanderthals have been extinct for a very long time... I thought they would have taught you that somewhere? Let me spell my position out to you in the clearest way possble I DID NOT WANT TO SEE MICKEY ADAMS LEAVE. I would gladly have given him more time, as I have said on many occassions. I'd probably have been willing to give him until the end of the season. Yes, I like to give managers TIME. Yet you seem singularly incapable of being able to grasp the inconsistency in your argument. You have a go at, what you say are, the many fans who hounded Mickey out and didnt give him the time he deserved. Yet you would do EXACTLY the same to another manager who has barely been the job half as long as Mickey was. I'm sure you would have been one of those Man Utd fans who wanted Alex Ferguson out in his early days... imagine how different things might have been now. I'm not saying thats going to happen to Leicester, I'd settle for just getting back in the Premiership, and therefore I'd like us to give time to a manager I think deserves it. Just as I think Mickey deserved it and didnt get it.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.