Best Owners?

[topharry123]

Ferdinand played less than half the season and Valencia about 10 games. Nani has not lived up to the hype since Ronaldo left and the moment Valencia is fit he's chucked onto the bench. Players like Anderson, O'Shea and Fletcher (although I accept that he has good games now and then) should be no where near a top 3 side. The twins have looked very naive in defence until recently but again haven't played many games and Rooney was a mess post-World Cup. He spent the first part of the season looking to leave and playing like a park footballer. They have looked very good in recent weeks and I actually enjoyed watching them play against Chelsea. But about half way through the season no one could believe they were top of the league and if the likes of Chelsea and Arsenal didn't bottle every opportunity they had they'd never have won.

Trying to keep it relevant to the thread, if they don't invest and other clubs begin to take over them, they'll be financially crippled. Even more so that 3 of their best players, Van der sar, Giggs and Scholes, haven't got many years left between them.

I guess we'll agree to disagree . Yes back to the thread. I think united have decent owners, yes that did put the club in a lot of debt but they are still running the club making a profit, while still investing in the team. Some will say that they're not investing like they should do, but I think they are exactly. They are getting decent players at decent prices and not going OTT like Chelsea, Man City. Might not be the most popular owners out there, but with the loans they still have great cashflow and show a profit, which are two of the most important things about running a successful business. With our new owners I think we'll be able to say how good they are in a year. They talk the talk, but we've not seen yet if they will really follow through.