Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

when_you're_smiling

Member
  • Posts

    3,124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by when_you're_smiling

  1. 3 hours ago, everton carr said:

    Wonder Why he's retiring?Would have thought he could easily have at least a couple more years esp at. Div 2 level.

    Going out at the top I’m guessing. He’s shown he can play in Div One therefore ticking off another achievement. Shame though as there’s evidently more seasons in him.

  2. 3 hours ago, Kitchandro said:

    These pundits do my head in.

     

    The handball rule is that it has to be intentional. I hear this every other week. Why are there 3 former professionals plus a presenter and not one of them can make this point.

     

    There is no such thing as an objective handball, so the only thing that matters is if the referee thinks the player did it on purpose or could have avoided handling it.

     

    Based on that it’s quite obvious that is not a penalty. Harsh is irrelevant. The presenter should be asking one question. Do you think it was intentional or not? If no, then you don’t think it’s a penalty.


    These guys are saying ‘no, I don’t think it was intentional’ and then saying they think the decision is correct. Idiots.

    I completely agree with you, however….

     

    ….they changed the law so even if it’s not deliberate it can still be penalised if someone ‘touches the ball with their hand/arm when it is in a position that makes their body unnaturally bigger and that position is not the result of their body moving fairly as part of play’

     

    Going away from a handball having to be deliberate has caused more problems IMO.

  3. 29 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said:

     

    Not entirely sure why a comparison with Curacao is needed, but as you've done it, they've done equally well to qualify, Country is minute compared to about 15 countries in that region. Finished above Haiti in their first qualification group and above Jamaica in their second. 

     

    Besides, North America gets six entrants, 3 have been taken by the host nations in this instance, but all six will come from Qualifying for 2030 and all six would have come from qualifying had it been elsewhere this year as opposed to North America, so a nonsense statement. They equally could be there under the usual 32 team format given their qualifying record. 

    The point is more about Cape Verde being underrated. They would have qualified if it was a 32 team tournament anyway. If Cameroon had have got a 0-0 draw, yeah people would be rightly impressed, but they wouldn’t call it ‘the biggest shock in World Cup history’ etc.

  4. Cape Verde are no mugs and certainly not like Curacao who have qualified because of the expansion and the fact the three best teams in their region are the hosts.

     

    They’ve been excellent in Africa for the last few years and probably would have qualified even for a 32 team World Cup after beating Cameroon in the group stages.

     

    Hopefully they beat Saudi Arabia and qualify.

    • Like 2
  5. 12 minutes ago, 21st Century Fox said:

    Brazil never really recovered from 2014 did they.

    As @Finnegan says they were poor then. Got a few dodgy decisions to beat Croatia, drew with Mexico and beat a poor Cameroon before shithousing wins over Chile (on pens) and Colombia before getting battered in the semi.  

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...