LAprice_ Posted 25 April 2015 Posted 25 April 2015 Any form of criticism based upon a "What if" suddenly loses all integrity. There have been many times this season when Pearson has fielded a team that the majority agrees with, e.g. Palace away. If anything, the last three games show just how fine the line is between success and failure. Liverpool away, Spurs at home and Burnley at home are also three examples of times when we've been on the opposite side of the line. I'm not saying that every match goes down to luck but it does play such a big part. The difference between scoring in the 90th and conceding in the 90th may be really insignificant in terms of the performance but when we look back it's the difference between our team being magnificent and our team being hopeless. The margins are tiny and yet the opinions change so drastically, just look at the inconsistency of Pearson's "Stay or Go" ratings.
SpacedX Posted 25 April 2015 Author Posted 25 April 2015 Any form of criticism based upon a "What if" suddenly loses all integrity. There have been many times this season when Pearson has fielded a team that the majority agrees with, e.g. Palace away. If anything, the last three games show just how fine the line is between success and failure. Liverpool away, Spurs at home and Burnley at home are also three examples of times when we've been on the opposite side of the line. I'm not saying that every match goes down to luck but it does play such a big part. The difference between scoring in the 90th and conceding in the 90th may be really insignificant in terms of the performance but when we look back it's the difference between our team being magnificent and our team being hopeless. The margins are tiny and yet the opinions change so drastically, just look at the inconsistency of Pearson's "Stay or Go" ratings. Finally an intelligent and constructive reply. "Any form of criticism based upon a "What if" suddenly loses all integrity. " And I very much agree. My intention was not to be provocative, rather to encourage reflection. Konch is in today, and as someone has remarked, well to be fair it's an enforced change. A few months ago PK was the expectation at L/B - It very much indicates how many things have changed both in perceptions and expectations in such a short space of time. This wasn't an anti Pearson thread...it is an acknowledgement of his attempts to turn this around. A situation that we should never have been in.
Buzzell Posted 25 April 2015 Posted 25 April 2015 Could imagine the Pearson Out brigade would be wanking themselves silly if this was the case.
SpacedX Posted 25 April 2015 Author Posted 25 April 2015 We will do this today. "Pointless thread" "Get out of here with your thinly veiled pop at the manager you nutter." "what a pointless post. Your rage is strong." "Out of all the threads I have ever seen on FT, this has to be the most pointless one" This forum was full of pessimism, worry and doubt going into today's game. The entire point of this thread - which was optimism, was completely buried under a hail abuse predicated by thin skinned sensitivities. "We will do this today" You missed that bit - the entire rationale of the thread. Didn't see much of that anywhere else on the other threads. Look what Sherwood has accomplished since Lambert was ousted. I wanted Nigel to go...instead he has proved me wrong in turning around a much worst situation than the Villa. Both have motivated teams which were capable of far more. My point was that there are far inferior sides that City (and Villa) which remain above us. In both cases this can be attributed to poor management. Sherwood has been a revelation. BUT... So has Nigel Pearson. "WE WILL DO THIS TODAY" Point made - thread done.
Guest Posted 25 April 2015 Posted 25 April 2015 Don't worry OP. You are one of a long line of city supporters who emabarrasingly are having to eat humble pie. Harder foor some than others I guess.
SpacedX Posted 25 April 2015 Author Posted 25 April 2015 Don't worry OP. You are one of a long line of city supporters who emabarrasingly are having to eat humble pie. Harder foor some than others I guess. Oh for ****s sake grow up. Why the confrontation? Quite the contrary - I'm saying that had Nige had managed to his potential an the potential of the team as he is doing now we wouldn't be in this situation - so actually that's a vindication. I'm acknowledging the positive changes in his management. It's nothing to do with humble pie. I like NP, but I despise the toxic way that he's managed for the majority of this season. And I'm not afraid to concede when I am wrong. This forum is replete with criticisms of players and formations that Pearson has doggedly adhered to ... crystalise that in a thread and dare to venture/make the suggestion that perhaps...just perhaps we would have accomplished more had this not been the case, and had he managed with the positive guile and decisive flair that he is now - and prepare to be shot down in flames. We will do this today. Where's the humble pie in that?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.