Barky Posted 11 November 2016 Posted 11 November 2016 14 minutes ago, GingerrrFox said: You don't have a clue what you're arguing about. Challsy put you in your place after you attempted to insult his intelligence and now you're spouting rubbish to try and save some face. A study funded by the Premier League is clearly going to have a positive bias, it's the same in any self driven study. When eggs were declared bad for cholesterol and not advised to consume regularly, who was it funded by? The answer is Kellogg's. It's now been shown that they manipulated the study to get the result they wanted. So people would buy and eat more cereal. That is exactly what the Premier League is doing with this study, including season tickets, concessions and elderly senior ticket prices to manipulate the average. Well it's not really exactly like that because you can't tell whether or not an egg is bad for cholesteral when you buy it, but you can tell the price of a ticket because they'll tell you exactly how much it's going to cost right before you buy it. So, if Scudamore's plan is to make people think tickets are cheaper than they are, surely that's all going to fall down when people are told the price before they make the purchase? Football tickets are nothing like eggs, i'm afraid. They don't even make good omelettes.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.