Craig Posted 2 January 2005 Posted 2 January 2005 But if we can get maybe 1-1.5 million for Connoly that will be superb. 51036[/snapback] Nobody in their right mind would pay £1-1.5m on a striker that has scored just 3 goals in 20+ games. 51038[/snapback] But how much is that to do with the style of play we have, and Connoly being Unlucky. He's his the post about ten times!!! 51040[/snapback] Closer to twenty times i'd say.
Leicester_Mad Posted 2 January 2005 Posted 2 January 2005 But if we can get maybe 1-1.5 million for Connoly that will be superb. 51036[/snapback] Nobody in their right mind would pay £1-1.5m on a striker that has scored just 3 goals in 20+ games. 51038[/snapback] But how much is that to do with the style of play we have, and Connoly being Unlucky. He's his the post about ten times!!! 51040[/snapback] Closer to twenty times i'd say. 51042[/snapback] and at least 15 of them 20times he should have hit the back of the net. For all his workrate and skill he is a worse finisher than Akinbyi
MON Posted 2 January 2005 Posted 2 January 2005 But if we can get maybe 1-1.5 million for Connoly that will be superb. 51036[/snapback] Nobody in their right mind would pay £1-1.5m on a striker that has scored just 3 goals in 20+ games. 51038[/snapback] But how much is that to do with the style of play we have, and Connoly being Unlucky. He's his the post about ten times!!! 51040[/snapback] Closer to twenty times i'd say. 51042[/snapback] and at least 15 of them 20times he should have hit the back of the net. For all his workrate and skill he is a worse finisher than Akinbyi 51104[/snapback] What tablets have you been taking?
Leicester_Mad Posted 2 January 2005 Posted 2 January 2005 But if we can get maybe 1-1.5 million for Connoly that will be superb. 51036[/snapback] Nobody in their right mind would pay £1-1.5m on a striker that has scored just 3 goals in 20+ games. 51038[/snapback] But how much is that to do with the style of play we have, and Connoly being Unlucky. He's his the post about ten times!!! 51040[/snapback] Closer to twenty times i'd say. 51042[/snapback] and at least 15 of them 20times he should have hit the back of the net. For all his workrate and skill he is a worse finisher than Akinbyi 51104[/snapback] What tablets have you been taking? 51116[/snapback] none. You telling me that Connolly is a good finisher then? thought not
TrickyTrev Posted 2 January 2005 Posted 2 January 2005 Connolly is a bad finisher, no better than Akinbiyi. We would only recouperate the about what we paid for him (400kish) and with our current lack of strikers I'd say we are p[robably better off keeping him. Scowcroft is another matter, anyone who wants him can have himn as far as I am concerned.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.