Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Stuliasz

Player Ratings vs Blackpool

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pressman = 4.5 - Poor kicking, slow, shakey

Makin = 4 - Poor distribution, slow, shakey, does try, just not good enough

Stewart = 6 - best game in a while vrs QPR, not so hot vrs pool

Dublin = 6 - OK, distribution poor, solid in the air, made a cock up - average

Keown = 6 - OK, Distribution poor, needs introducing to the midfielders

Dabizas = 6 - OK, As Keown

Gudjonsson = 5.5 - Busy fool at times, needs better balls from back 3

Gemmill = 4.5 - Poor. Lost posession, distribution poor, non-creative

Williams = 7.5* - Best man on pitch, box to box, very trying, improoving

Connolly = 6 - OK, long balls from back 3 not what he needs, keep the faith

Scowcroft = 3.5 - What has happened to my favourite player? Very Poor.

Maybury = 7 - Bright start, pace, skill, good throwins, interesting+++

De Vries = 5.5 - Big, but slow. Not fit yet. Time will tell

Nalis = 6 - Has been poor recently, but did improove things when came on

<_<

Posted
Pressman = 4.5 - Poor kicking, slow, shakey

Makin    = 4 - Poor distribution, slow, shakey, does try, just not good enough

Stewart    = 6 - best game in a while vrs QPR, not so hot vrs pool

Dublin      = 6 - OK, distribution poor, solid in the air, made a cock up - average

Keown      = 6 - OK, Distribution poor, needs introducing to the midfielders

Dabizas    = 6 - OK, As Keown

Gudjonsson = 5.5 - Busy fool at times, needs better balls from back 3

Gemmill    = 4.5 - Poor.  Lost posession, distribution poor, non-creative

Williams    = 7.5* - Best man on pitch, box to box, very trying, improoving

Connolly    = 6 - OK, long balls from back 3 not what he needs, keep the faith

Scowcroft  = 3.5 - What has happened to my favourite player? Very Poor. 

Maybury    = 7 - Bright start, pace, skill, good throwins, interesting+++

De Vries    = 5.5 - Big, but slow.  Not fit yet.  Time will tell

Nalis      = 6 - Has been poor recently, but did improove things when came on

<_<

53504[/snapback]

Looked pretty quick to me :ermm:

Posted
Cut off point for ratings is 7pm, the results will be announced shortly after.

53581[/snapback]

Quote, Craig Levien; He was only 70% fit. Like I said, I think he looked a touch slow, time will tell. I'm not casting aspersions yet by any means!! :blink:

Posted

Pressman 5

Makin 4

Stewart 6

Dublin 6

Keown 5

Dabizas 5

Gudjonsson 5

Gemmill 5

Williams 7

Connolly 6

Scowcroft 3

Subs:

Maybury 5

De Vries 5

Nalis 5

Scowcroft should be replaced and soon, yet another poor poor dismal performance!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...