Nippafox Posted 5 August 2004 Posted 5 August 2004 Gemmill has signed a 3 month contract at Filbert Way.
Mark Posted 5 August 2004 Posted 5 August 2004 Pointless signing I'll stick by my first decision i made weeks ago, unlike some on here who are loving him after an average few pre season games
Scow Posted 5 August 2004 Posted 5 August 2004 We needed some central midfield cover and Gemmill provides that. He's only on a three month contract, so if he's shite, we can easily get rid.
Oli Posted 5 August 2004 Posted 5 August 2004 Pointless signing I'll stick by my first decision i made weeks ago, unlike some on here who are loving him after an average few pre season games Your right Petrescu. No point signing him, he aint any good. He impressed on a trial. So did Hignett at least but he aint good.
Hullfox Posted 5 August 2004 Posted 5 August 2004 Pointless signing I'll stick by my first decision i made weeks ago, unlike some on here who are loving him after an average few pre season games Your right Petrescu. No point signing him, he aint any good. He impressed on a trial. So did Hignett at least but he aint good. Don't remember Hignett as being on trial at all and the Mickey slaters went to town recently stating that. We sign someone as cover for three months to give us an option and it's seen as a pointless signing. Is it just me or does anybody else think it's a reasonable shout. It's not so long ago that Billy McKinlay played without a contract and became a hero so I don't see what peoples problems are. He (SG) didn't play a great deal last season so what are people suppose to judge him on other than the friendlies he's contributed to and the next three months?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.