Crazy Offside Rule

[A fox for life]

can anyone remember that crazy offside rule they bought in a few years back, which they then retracted because teams kept taking the mick and standing on the line for things like free kicks. have a feeling somone like man city did it against us at the walkers.

some help?

[Flexx]

It was Bolton against us. As to what the rule was, i am not sure:S

[lildave3]

It was Bolton, and one of them led to the Ian Walker **** up.

[A fox for life]

where he hooked it around the post?

[Unit]

I thought it was leeds? they took the piss didn';t they?

[Flexx]

Found this

Sam Allardyce's inventive demonstration of the absurdity of the latest interpretation of the offside law is likely to be outlawed at an emergency summit meeting this morning.

Sam Allardyce's inventive demonstration of the absurdity of the latest interpretation of the offside law is likely to be outlawed at an emergency summit meeting this morning.

At Leicester on Tuesday the Bolton Wanderers manager instructed his players to take up advanced positions, previously considered to be offside but now viewed as "inactive" unless the ball reached them, at free-kicks. They then ran into onside positions as play progressed. The move confused the Leicester City defence and, according to the goalkeeper, Ian Walker, was a factor in his conceding an embarrassing goal.

Prompted by referees concerned at this development, and alarmed at the prospect of this ploy being repeated in matches across the land, inevitably leading to disciplinary problems at park level, the Football Association's head of refereeing, John Baker, has since conducted an informal debate with relevant parties.

This morning he and Keith Hackett, the Premiership referees' supervisor, will present their conclusions to Mark Palios, Richard Scudamore and Andy Williamson, the respective senior executives of the FA, the Premier League and the Football League. They are expected to agree that such exploitation of the letter of the law be regarded as infringing its spirit and, as such, be punishable by a yellow card for unsporting behaviour. An advisory will be sent to clubs to that effect.

The advice will concentrate on situations where an attacker deliberately places himself "in the eye-line" of an opponent, usually the goalkeeper, and the ball, thus distracting him. This would exclude, for example, Thierry Henry's habit of drifting into an "offside" position, behind a defender, to avoid being marked, only coming onside as play develops, as he usually does this 40-odd yards from goal.

The reinterpretation will not alter the recent policy of regarding players as "inactive" if they are not in the goalkeeper's eye-line. Thus Ruud van Nistelrooy's controversial recent goal against Southampton, when he was offside when a free-kick was played in, but not when the ball finally reached him, would still stand. But Danny Murphy's goal against Leeds United in October, when Paul Robinson, distracted by three Liverpool players in "offside" positions, allowed the ball to squirm through his arms, ought not.

Fifa, the game's world governing body, will doubtless follow the FA's ruling. The global television coverage of the Premiership means that Fifa are sensitive to the example set in the English game, especially "reinterpretations" of a Fifa ruling. However, changes in the offside rule are more controversial in England than most countries because defences generally play a higher line, prompting more decisions.

[Flexx]

As for the Ian Walker own goal against Bolton, in the SAME game.

:laugh:

[A fox for life]

Found this

good work!

can anyone explain that in english though haha

think i get it

[Jack]

In the same game didn't Gerry try it for us, just to take the mick.

Im sure it was something like that

[ousefox]

In the same game didn't Gerry try it for us, just to take the mick.

Im sure it was something like that

Yeah i remember that but nothing happened cos of it!

[Fat Ron]

The rule was pretty simple (yet ridiculous!!)

You could only be deemed offside if you recieved the ball, after Bolton manipulated the rule against us the FA promptly changed the rule so that you could be deemed offside if you were seen to gain an davantage being being in an offside position, ie distracting opposition defenders.

Its still b*llocks and teams still bend the rules because the FA (let alone Referees) are still unclear as to what the rule means so there are inconsistancies in every game (And they helped write the bloody rule!!) . Its all about interpretation, which when laying down rules of the game is a dangerous and stupid idea!!

Rules need to be set in stone, break them and be punished.