Knighton Matt Posted 25 April 2005 Posted 25 April 2005 read the comments here... http://www.tigers.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.ph...der=asc&start=0
filbertway Posted 25 April 2005 Posted 25 April 2005 read the comments here...http://www.tigers.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.ph...der=asc&start=0 98486[/snapback] I hope they all hate it, it means we get to keep it
Knighton Matt Posted 25 April 2005 Author Posted 25 April 2005 opinion seems to be split possibly more haters than lovers but its marginal. upsets me to see them saying things like if we move in i hope they change the colour of seats/leicester city banners etc! NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
Frenzied Posted 25 April 2005 Posted 25 April 2005 I was initailly in favour of sharing, for financial reasons. However, we would be relinquishing our stadium (even though technically it's not ours) and sharing it with a bunch of rugger buggers. A stadium is very important to a football club, it's part of its identity. By sharing the ground we would be giving up a part of our identity. I'm leaning further to the egg chasers keeping their potting shed and staying away from a real sporting venue. However, I may change my mind again if I see positives outweighing the negatives.
Chandler Posted 25 April 2005 Posted 25 April 2005 The sceptics were influenced by the result. Had the Tigers won they would not have raised their absurd objections such as beer and programmes prices ( no doubt we will similar guff on here tomorrow about divots and pitch markings). Overall, most Tigers fans made the correct observations on sight and sound. The Miller Partnership used unique software in the design of our sight lines. The views in the Walkers are the best in Britain. And the atmosphere is kept in because of our roof design which is second only to Eastlands (Ove Arup). So now you know...
toonboy Posted 25 April 2005 Posted 25 April 2005 opinion seems to be split possibly more haters than lovers but its marginal. upsets me to see them saying things like if we move in i hope they change the colour of seats/leicester city banners etc! NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! 98489[/snapback] as far as i know the teams would have the ground on a 50-50 basis and it would have to represent both teams. im not sure if they would just have half the seats green but some things would definately change.
filbertway Posted 25 April 2005 Posted 25 April 2005 opinion seems to be split possibly more haters than lovers but its marginal. upsets me to see them saying things like if we move in i hope they change the colour of seats/leicester city banners etc! NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! 98489[/snapback] as far as i know the teams would have the ground on a 50-50 basis and it would have to represent both teams. im not sure if they would just have half the seats green but some things would definately change. 98591[/snapback] And that is the reason we dont want it to happen.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.