El Furio Posted 16 January 2010 Posted 16 January 2010 Just wanted to air my frustration at the fact that you cant seem to make a comment on here that goes anyway to critisising one of the 'fan's favourites' without being told that you know nothing about football. Although it was quite funny that someone who claimed I new nothing sited the Swansea game on the opening day of the season as an example of us winning when King plays. King was actually substituted when we were 1-0 down and then we went on to win 2-1. Anyhow this will be my last post as I signed up to here for some interesting debate on my beloved Leicester City, but all their seems to be is overly partisan, rose tinted views and no chance of objective argument. Up the City.
Shrenchel Posted 16 January 2010 Posted 16 January 2010 Thank fvck for that. Worst poster since Fox92. And wrong forum you dense bastard. Make sure you don't push that pull door on your way out.
Lillehamring Posted 16 January 2010 Posted 16 January 2010 Just wanted to air my frustration at the fact that you cant seem to make a comment on here that goes anyway to critisising one of the 'fan's favourites' without being told that you know nothing about football.Although it was quite funny that someone who claimed I new nothing sited the Swansea game on the opening day of the season as an example of us winning when King plays. King was actually substituted when we were 1-0 down and then we went on to win 2-1. Anyhow this will be my last post as I signed up to here for some interesting debate on my beloved Leicester City, but all their seems to be is overly partisan, rose tinted views and no chance of objective argument. Up the City. well, that's 40 posts of foxes talk that will go down in history i'm sure you'll be checking back on this heroic thread to see how people are reacting to your grand gesture, so i'll take 30 seconds to respond... ...the fact that you simply look for the slightest frailty in a post that otherwise proved you hopelessly ignorant pretty much sums up the pointlessness of your contribution to this board. that post was just a general summary of kings involvement to show that generally the observation you made in an attempt to make a point was inaccurate, you also conveniently don't mention that we also went on to win a game after he was brought on as a sub, balancing this element out and therefore omitted to protect the increasing number of simple minds appearing on this board if you can't handle a bit of contradiction, then.... .
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.