Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

foxes_rule1978

Member
  • Posts

    25,915
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by foxes_rule1978

  1. No issues with Ruud, just terrible players
  2. Let’s **** this season off,get to the championship
  3. Mostly blind and it makes it better
  4. We need creativity especially without Fatawu, the Dewsbury-hall link is not bad he provides that
  5. Our players look like old men
  6. We are absolutely shit but that was better, someone decided to not want to get their hairpiece out of place
  7. I’ll give Ruud a lot of time, even if relegated
  8. Got nothing against Ruud, but we look disorganised and certain players aren’t doing their duty
  9. Always knew that, he handles the ball well and provides a forward pass
  10. That was decent
  11. Nah he isn’t, he looks a good manager and talks well. Just hard when you have only useless twats to select
  12. Even if city paid me to manage this useless lot I wouldn’t take it. Has a nobody it would ruin my reputation
  13. Two useless teams
  14. Ruud hasn’t took on these useless twats without a warchest in January
  15. Southampton too, but we need at least another one. Anyway Ruud needs time, and hopefully gets backed in jan to give us a chance
  16. Surely Ruud doesn’t take the job without any money in Jan?
  17. Ruud was guaranteed some funds in January, because these players from back to front are useless
  18. Wolves have nothing, terrible, in come a 1 nil win for them
  19. Wolves look absolutely awful
  20. Yeah that was just simple, vardy no doubt a master but we need to take those
  21. Absolutely; Usyk getting the result was deserved, he was brilliant, but the margin of the win tells you how bad the judges can be.
  22. Ridiculous how this was scored and an injustice to fury who did well against the best heavyweight in my view. The first fight he gets a split decision when absolutely destroyed, then he steps up and gets a score that is unanimous by 4! I don’t get it,
  23. I always watch without the commentary, I had a draw, but I can forgive 1 or 2 of the middle rounds either way. Usyk no doubt worthy winner of what was actually a great contest in my view
  24. Draw was fair for me, but yeah no problems with Usyk taking it at all… not by 4 though
×
×
  • Create New...