Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Wasyls Pec Deck

Member
  • Posts

    8,940
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Wasyls Pec Deck

  1. I’m not convinced by this appointment, but I don’t think we should automatically write him off straight away. I don’t think that’s helpful. He talks a good talk, but can he deliver. If I get a sense of him being demanding and driving standards - like he says - then I think he could be what we need. For too long the culture around the place has stunk, and my hope is that he can change that. 

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  2. This appointments just so lacks imagination and it’s so predictable. And we carry on this bizarre obsession with Southampton… I think he’s come across as a pillock elsewhere, but I’ll give him a go and want him to succeed like any manager. I just don’t think he will. Oh and get ready for a Smallbone 😂 

  3. 8 hours ago, kingfox said:

    Interesting comments from a BBC article on his time at Rangers.

     

    Didn’t do him much good, but seems he can change when he’s practically shitting himself.

    The fact Martin has moved away from the philosophy he has stuck by for so many years perhaps illustrates just how much pressure he is under at Ibrox.

    In the last two league games, he has adopted a 4-2-3-1 shape with summer signings Aarons and Rothwell absent. In front of the defence sits a more positionally strict and industrial midfield duo.

    Martin would typically ask his full-backs and attacking midfielders to get up the pitch, overloading the midfield and wide areas in attack, but in recent games there has been a reluctance in committing players to attack.

    In build-up, Tavernier still forms a back three with the centre-backs but there is more support centrally from the midfield. The keeper and defenders have been more willing to punt it up the pitch, too.

    These appear to be pragmatic changes that stray away from a Martin side.

    Looking at the league data before and after the Club Brugge loss highlights how stark the change in style has been.

    You have to take into account the quality of the opposition, but possession is down from 70% to almost 50%, with Rangers spending longer defending deeper and there has been an increase in how often they have gone long.

    They are also facing fewer shots and the plan appears to have been put in place to solidify the team in the face of conceding big chances.

    It is, however, hindering their attacking play, with the amount of shots they are taking per game almost half of what they were achieving previously.

    I think you’ve written this with invisible ink!

    • Haha 1
  4. I’ve seen links to Will Smallbone on a free if Martin becomes manager. As far as I’m concerned, irrespective of if he’d he a good signing at this level, we must avoid him at all costs as I’ve spent years taking the piss out of him based on spurious rumours of his teeny weeny.

  5. 24 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

    According to Wikipedia he has two older brothers, Jamie and David, and a younger brother, Pepe…… makes sense.

    And don’t forget Ricky who is livin’ da vida loca

  6. 14 minutes ago, Wasyls Pec Deck said:

    Calculating a response rate based on leaflet distribution is misleading. I did the survey as I saw it promoted on social media and emails etc and I didn’t get a leaflet. It was distributed in ways that weren’t controlled, but as you would expect. Ultimately it’s not possible to calculate a response rate, but we do know that the overall level of participation is very strong. 
     

    Also most of the sample are not FT members so this idea it’s the views of one group is not right either - if the club use that to criticise they are mistaken. Going over the findings it would seem to me that the sample reflects the views of a mostly long term, experienced and committed fan base from various factions and with different engagement/ticketing behaviour. There are many signs of this all having really good breadth and legitimacy.

     

    Those who developed the survey did consult with individuals and, by extension different groups, in respect of the survey design. With surveys you only get data on the questions you ask, and it seems to me the engagement in terms of what was asked was also fairly robust. Also other groups did publicise the survey and push it. I’m not sure what else they could have done!

    Also I’m not sure it’s right or helpful to criticise all this for not coming from all the groups. It sort of assumes there is no overlap between the groups in terms of individuals and views. I noted one of the lads on the reveal on YouTube is also in UFS for example, and do we have any evidence that each group has significantly different views? If anything, I think at this point views are all pretty unified!

  7. 58 minutes ago, ian__marshall said:

    I watched the results presentation last night live and did hear the details. For the record my views are not to be interpreted as criticism. The survey is an unbelievable undertaking and as others have mentioned the sample size is absolutely a strong indicator of fan sentiment in my view. 

     

    However, seeing the response from the club, has not surprised me. Yet again I have little faith that they will embrace the feedback and hold themselves to account. Rather they'll shrug off the results and take minimal action citing misalignment of views following consultation with other groups. 

     

    I wholeheartedly agree that the sample size is significant and cannot be ignored. However, to say that other supporter groups were alerted to the survey, and yes some of their members may have completed the survey, is not the same as saying they were consulted on their views, and they collaborated with the Trust to fully endorse the survey and stand behind the results lending their name to the outcomes presented. 

     

    I would also agree that statistically given the number of leaflets distributed, a near 30% response rate is towards the higher end. But it's all about perspectives and the lens through which each party views the results. You and I will see this as a great response and a true representation of fan sentiment, the club on the other hand will likely argue that the sentiment portrayed isn't as strong as suggested if two thirds chose not to engage, regardless of the statistical significance. 

     

    I appreciate the efforts of those involved, everyone is doing a good job especially as it's voluntary work taking up personal time. I would  personally like to thank each individual for trying to create change; it's important given the current state of the club. I just think that there will be learnings on this journey and it's important that they are considered moving forwards to avoid giving those at the club who are accountable for listening and affecting change any excuse to dismiss or reduce the significance of the information put before them.

     

    Calculating a response rate based on leaflet distribution is misleading. I did the survey as I saw it promoted on social media and emails etc and I didn’t get a leaflet. It was distributed in ways that weren’t controlled, but as you would expect. Ultimately it’s not possible to calculate a response rate, but we do know that the overall level of participation is very strong. 
     

    Also most of the sample are not FT members so this idea it’s the views of one group is not right either - if the club use that to criticise they are mistaken. Going over the findings it would seem to me that the sample reflects the views of a mostly long term, experienced and committed fan base from various factions and with different engagement/ticketing behaviour. There are many signs of this all having really good breadth and legitimacy.

     

    Those who developed the survey did consult with individuals and, by extension different groups, in respect of the survey design. With surveys you only get data on the questions you ask, and it seems to me the engagement in terms of what was asked was also fairly robust. Also other groups did publicise the survey and push it. I’m not sure what else they could have done!

×
×
  • Create New...