The whole world smiles Posted 13 February 2018 Posted 13 February 2018 58 minutes ago, chicagofox said: Richie De Laet played a huge part in the Championship winning season. So what? He deserves credit for overcoming his injuries. In terms of that being relevant to whether he should currently have a place in the starting 11, so what? I’m assuming you don’t know him personally. If I’m correct, you like the rest of us on here, really don’t know anything about his character. The character and work rate of any fan is completely irrelevant when discussing a footballers on-field ability. Is someone who may not have the character to run the UK not entitled to an opinion on the Prime Minister? The plural of ‘life’ is ‘lives’. I was going to reply and engage in a decent bit of debate with you because you made some good points but then you started correcting grammar, and I realised this guy is just a nobhead don't waste your time. This is a forum for football fans of all backgrounds to discuss football. We are not writing university dissatations. If you want perfect spelling and grammar buy the gaurdian son your (you're???) In the wrong place here at foxestalk. Ps what's the plural of nobhead?
chicagofox Posted 13 February 2018 Posted 13 February 2018 6 minutes ago, The whole world smiles said: this guy is just a nobhead Ps what's the plural of nobhead? Does your anti nasty post stance only apply to others? The plural is nobheads.
The whole world smiles Posted 13 February 2018 Posted 13 February 2018 3 hours ago, hackneyfox said: What a pointless post. We're discussing what he does or doesn't give to the current squad, not what he did 2 or 3 seasons ago, time moves on. We're discussing his footballing ability not his character. We're comparing him to other players not to you or Mike. Why get personal with the OP and by the way the place to support the players is when they're on the pitch, the internet is the place to discuss what we think about players or the club, it doesn't demand blind, unswerving loyalty. I only got personal with the op because of the deliberately disrespectul and antagonistic thread title and it's not the first time he's done it. (See the musa thread). If the thread title had been 'is James good enough for the first team?' Then I would have been much more balanced and polite in my response. 1
chicagofox Posted 13 February 2018 Posted 13 February 2018 (edited) The thread title is simply a question. And in itself it gives no indication as to the posters point of view. Edited 13 February 2018 by chicagofox
The whole world smiles Posted 13 February 2018 Posted 13 February 2018 4 minutes ago, chicagofox said: Does your anti nasty post stance only apply to others? The plural is nobheads. My anti nasty post policy does not apply to pedantic grammar Nazis
The whole world smiles Posted 13 February 2018 Posted 13 February 2018 1 minute ago, chicagofox said: The title thread is simply a question. And in itself it gives no indication as to the posters point of view. Come of it son it's a leading question. 1
Recommended Posts