Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Dahnsouff said:

It’s the easiest thing in the world to be right after the fact.

Ok, frame it differently then.

 

Is Emery objectively a better manager than Rodgers? Yes.

3x Europa league trophies with Sevilla

1x Europa league trophy with Villareal

Ligue 1 trophy with PSG

 

This was all before hindsight.

 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Lloyd90 said:

And you think they will stay there forever? Or as I suggested by cycles, in the next 2 or 3 years they will be in decline. 

I was saying this to a few mates earlier.

 

Villa, Brighton, West Ham etc will experience a fall off at some point soon despite recent success - West Ham already are.

 

Its impossible for smaller clubs to break into the top 6 for a sustained period of time without serious Newcastle level investment.

 

It works for better and for worse. Things will change eventually. I got laughed at for saying this, but we will be playing European football again - whether it’s in 10 years or 50.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BrilliantFox said:

Is Emery objectively a better manager than Rodgers?

Arsenal were desperate for Rodgers after sacking Emery 

Posted
Just now, BrilliantFox said:

Ok, frame it differently then.

 

Is Emery objectively a better manager than Rodgers? Yes.

3x Europa league trophies with Sevilla

1x Europa league trophy with Villareal

Ligue 1 trophy with PSG

 

This was all before hindsight.

He failed at Arsenal though! And I am not disputing we need a change of ownership, we do but to suggest somebody who massively benefited from this same ownership would slander them is just bonkers. You could easily argue that Jamie would not have had the career he has had without them.

Posted
Just now, niyaminski said:

Arsenal were desperate for Rodgers after sacking Emery 

Emery didn't suit Arsenal for tactical reasons. His playstyle is looked down upon by clubs like Arsenal as he applies the mid-block and doesn't "play the Arsenal way".

Posted
1 minute ago, Dahnsouff said:

He failed at Arsenal though! And I am not disputing we need a change of ownership, we do but to suggest somebody who massively benefited from this same ownership would slander them is just bonkers. You could easily argue that Jamie would not have had the career he has had without them.

Of course. They are the bloody owners who paid a million quid for him from a non league side when no one else would lol

  • Like 1
Posted

I would guess he was very tempted to say it at the time he went but I don’t think he will as it’ll ruin his relationship with the club, not us ever, he’ll always be a true blue for us. 
 

He knows like the rest of us that Dumb & Dumber are complete runts 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

NDA like the rest of them I pressume.

Would the ownership be nefarious enough to make a player sign an NDA?

 

Its usually only corporate staff that have to do so.

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, BrilliantFox said:

Would the ownership be nefarious enough to make a player sign an NDA?

 

Its usually only corporate staff that have to do so.

 

 

Everything there is behind an NDA. Anthony got it wrapped up tight.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...