Who?

[Muz]

They're both terrible excuses of footballers. But If i had too choose , Id drop Hammil.

They both offer us nothing , but our tactical genius of a manager seems to think different.

[andyh1884]

Kisnorbo. I'd release him from a cannon into the North Sea.

[Muz]

Kisnorbo. I'd release him from a cannon into the North Sea.

Is that the right away back to Australia

[andyh1884]

Not fussy, just so long as he was far enough away so levein couldn't/wouldn't select him, although given his love of the useless **** it'd probably need to be about that far

[Thracian]

I'd like to hear the official reasoning for playing either based on their performances so far.

[Cat Burger]

Tough question, Hamill is worse but Kisnorbo is in a more important position!

[The Reverend]

At the end of the day, they are both shite. As Thracian said, i would like to hear why Levein persists in playing them. Okay, Hamill was a forced change with Smith suspended but Kisnorbo? He offers nothing to the team at all. What does Levein see in him? Surely about......well........ 100% of Leicester fans cant be wrong!

I would just like to know what Levein see's that 100% of Leicester fans just dont?