fordy_uk2005 Posted 9 December 2009 Posted 9 December 2009 why do we keep changing the team so often apart from when its forced upon us. we started the season well howard fryatt and wide men even though howard wasnt scoring he was creating. now for some reason were trying to find kermagrant a place without any reason for him being in the team, in my opinion although oakly king and wellens are prob 3 of are best they cant always all play. give adams dyer or n'guessen a few games with wide men hitting big steve and see what happens
Guest Basildon Fox Posted 9 December 2009 Posted 9 December 2009 why do we keep changing the team so often apart from when its forced upon us. we started the season well howard fryatt and wide men even though howard wasnt scoring he was creating. now for some reason were trying to find kermagrant a place without any reason for him being in the team, in my opinion although oakly king and wellens are prob 3 of are best they cant always all play. give adams dyer or n'guessen a few games with wide men hitting big steve and see what happens Surely you are advocating changing again?
fordy_uk2005 Posted 9 December 2009 Author Posted 9 December 2009 Surely you are advocating changing again? how do you work that one out
Fox92 Posted 9 December 2009 Posted 9 December 2009 I am not sure why we change the team around all the time. Ok, we were poor and unbalanced at S****horpe, but we didn't loose and shouldn't have changed the side ahead of Nottingham Forest.
The Doctor Posted 9 December 2009 Posted 9 December 2009 how do you work that one out you start saying that this constant change is unessecery then say we should change this and that. Suggesting we do something is advocating that something. Ergo you're advocating more change despite complaining about change which means you're also a hypocrite.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.