B52 Posted 24 February 2011 Posted 24 February 2011 I am confused. One says Ricardo was great another one says he was worst. It's the same when talking about Berner, Vassell, Dyer, Yak, Waghorn, Aanholt, Weale, Abe, Oakley, Wellens, King and Gallagher. Wich threadtalker is worth reading? Is there a possibility for a forum certificate in order to get the strange roller coaster comments more balanced?
ibbosuk Posted 24 February 2011 Posted 24 February 2011 I am confused. One says Ricardo was great another one says he was worst. It's the same when talking about Berner, Vassell, Dyer, Yak, Waghorn, Aanholt, Weale, Abe, Oakley, Wellens, King and Gallagher. Wich threadtalker is worth reading? Is there a possibility for a forum certificate in order to get the strange roller coaster comments more balanced? I AM !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Zingari Posted 24 February 2011 Posted 24 February 2011 just accept that the British have quite a strange sense of humour and sometimes it may not translate
ozleicester Posted 24 February 2011 Posted 24 February 2011 I would suggest that you change your opinion each week... seems to be the standard amongst many here (see ben Mee)
B52 Posted 24 February 2011 Author Posted 24 February 2011 just accept that the British have quite a strange sense of humour and sometimes it may not translate Oh, you mean like C.S. reminds me of the Black Knight in "The search for the holy Grail". It was all buttjoke..
Kenners Posted 24 February 2011 Posted 24 February 2011 I also suggest you overreact to EVERYTHING, good or bad and you'll fit in fine.
B52 Posted 26 February 2011 Author Posted 26 February 2011 Certificate please.... Aanholt wasn't bad. Ricardo wasn't bad. The defence was exposed because we were pushing high up and met with another King.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.