Zingari Posted 12 March 2014 Author Posted 12 March 2014 Here are the numbers on the second plane as issued by the FAA, the time is expressed in aviation "zulu" time which is GMT. It shows he dropped 14438 feet in 2.60 minutes that's an average of 5553' per minute. In the last 22 seconds, he dropped 2000' which equals a dive of 10000 feet per minute which is anything but straight and level as you state. You can see the speed and angle of descent every 12 seconds. As to the second point regarding controllability, the plane didn't deviate much in the last twenty miles and even so, the navigation system can be dialed in to exact fixed points and altitude if necessary. Edit, more detailed information What G force would be exerted on the aircraft and pilot in this scenario ? I've heard pilots 911 truth suggesting around 5G force for both 175 and 77 , is that wrong ? Would the plane be controllable ? would it definitely even remain intact , and would a pilot still be capable of doing so under such force?. Seriously though Smudge , you really ought to put these points on the pilots 911truth forum if you think they are wrong . Ex pilots are welcome to make contributions on the forum and you'd get much better answers than from me
Zingari Posted 12 March 2014 Author Posted 12 March 2014 Christ, there's no pleasing some people is there? It was demonstrated twice in the space of a couple of hours in front of thousands of witnesses. And recorded on dozens of video cameras so you can watch it over and over at your leisure. There was plane debris everywhere. They only found part of an undercarriage recently, wedged between two buildings (one of which was the mosque) I think you,ve misunderstood what Lear is saying about the debris . He is saying that the aircraft should have broken up on impact with the side of the building and debris should have fallen to ground from the point of impact . All video evidence suggest the whole of the plane is completely swallowed up by the building. No debris is left on the outside ( you can see the whole of the plane disappear into the building) . whatever debris is found must have either exited from the other side or thrown out during the collapse . Have you read the affidavit?
Smudge Posted 12 March 2014 Posted 12 March 2014 What G force would be exerted on the aircraft and pilot in this scenario ? I've heard pilots 911 truth suggesting around 5G force for both 175 and 77 , is that wrong ? Would the plane be controllable ? would it definitely even remain intact , and would a pilot still be capable of doing so under such force?. Seriously though Smudge , you really ought to put these points on the pilots 911truth forum if you think they are wrong . Ex pilots are welcome to make contributions on the forum and you'd get much better answers than from me As you know, g force is a measurement of force relative to normal gravity and occurs when there is a change in status such as acceleration or during vertical or horizontal turns. In freefall an object accelerates at 32 ft per second squared. Obviously flying in a straight line isn't concerning since aircraft fly at high speeds all the time. In Concorde's, case at Mach 2 without impact on the passengers or crew. I don't believe a civilian pilot could withstand 5 g's without blacking out so I don't think they would have been subjected to that. By and large the change in state of the plane varied very little in the horizontal plane and I'm not qualified to say whether the accelerations and vertical turns would have been enough to have such high forces on it.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.